Carl Mäsak wrote:
Carl (>>), Darren (>):
[...] and the
'trusts' keyword hasn't been realized in any Perl 6 implementation so
far.
I seem to recall that Pugs did support 'trusts' a few years ago, and that I
used it. But I could be wrong. -- Darren Duncan
I stand corrected. A quick search thro
Carl (>>), Darren (>):
>> [...] and the
>> 'trusts' keyword hasn't been realized in any Perl 6 implementation so
>> far.
>
> I seem to recall that Pugs did support 'trusts' a few years ago, and that I
> used it. But I could be wrong. -- Darren Duncan
I stand corrected. A quick search through the
Carl Mäsak wrote:
Carl (), Moritz (>>>), Carl (>>), Moritz (>):
um, so 'protected' is when the deriving classes can see the attribute?
yup
that's what 'private' means in Perl 6.
That's wrong. Perl 6's "private" is like Java's "private" - subclasses
can't see it.
It's just Rakudo being le
Carl (), Moritz (>>>), Carl (>>), Moritz (>):
um, so 'protected' is when the deriving classes can see the
attribute?
yup
that's what 'private' means in Perl 6.
>>>
>>> That's wrong. Perl 6's "private" is like Java's "private" - subclasses
>>> can't see it.
>>> It's just
Hello,
I am looking to work on the test suite as part of the GSoC program. I
have a couple of questions, though, if somebody could help me out:
The ideas page
(http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl5/index.cgi?gsoc_2010_projects) spoke
of the IO section needing quite a bit more work, is this referri
Hi,
drakej wrote:
> I am looking to work on the test suite as part of the GSoC program. I
> have a couple of questions, though, if somebody could help me out:
>
> The ideas page
> (http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl5/index.cgi?gsoc_2010_projects) spoke
> of the IO section needing quite a bit mo