Re: You never have privacy from your children in Perl 6

2010-03-25 Thread Darren Duncan
Carl Mäsak wrote: Carl (>>), Darren (>): [...] and the 'trusts' keyword hasn't been realized in any Perl 6 implementation so far. I seem to recall that Pugs did support 'trusts' a few years ago, and that I used it. But I could be wrong. -- Darren Duncan I stand corrected. A quick search thro

Re: You never have privacy from your children in Perl 6

2010-03-25 Thread Carl Mäsak
Carl (>>), Darren (>): >> [...] and the >> 'trusts' keyword hasn't been realized in any Perl 6 implementation so >> far. > > I seem to recall that Pugs did support 'trusts' a few years ago, and that I > used it.  But I could be wrong. -- Darren Duncan I stand corrected. A quick search through the

Re: You never have privacy from your children in Perl 6

2010-03-25 Thread Darren Duncan
Carl Mäsak wrote: Carl (), Moritz (>>>), Carl (>>), Moritz (>): um, so 'protected' is when the deriving classes can see the attribute? yup that's what 'private' means in Perl 6. That's wrong. Perl 6's "private" is like Java's "private" - subclasses can't see it. It's just Rakudo being le

Re: You never have privacy from your children in Perl 6

2010-03-25 Thread Carl Mäsak
Carl (), Moritz (>>>), Carl (>>), Moritz (>): um, so 'protected' is when the deriving classes can see the attribute? yup that's what 'private' means in Perl 6. >>> >>> That's wrong. Perl 6's "private" is like Java's "private" - subclasses >>> can't see it. >>> It's just

Perl6 Test Suite

2010-03-25 Thread drakej
Hello, I am looking to work on the test suite as part of the GSoC program. I have a couple of questions, though, if somebody could help me out: The ideas page (http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl5/index.cgi?gsoc_2010_projects) spoke of the IO section needing quite a bit more work, is this referri

Re: Perl6 Test Suite

2010-03-25 Thread Moritz Lenz
Hi, drakej wrote: > I am looking to work on the test suite as part of the GSoC program. I > have a couple of questions, though, if somebody could help me out: > > The ideas page > (http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl5/index.cgi?gsoc_2010_projects) spoke > of the IO section needing quite a bit mo