On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 08:53:02PM -0800, Darren Duncan wrote:
: Basically, I found this line in Synopsis 2, in the section talking about
unspace:
:
: 1+3\ i;
:
: So the question is about whether this example should be kept as
: still valid code or whether it is now invalid and a fossil
I think I found a Synopsis fossil, in light of revision 29931, but wanted to be
sure ...
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-03-03 18:34:04 +0100 (Wed, 03 Mar 2010)
New Revision: 29931
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
Log:
[S02] remove 1/2 and +2-3i literal f
Author: Darren_Duncan
Date: 2010-03-14 01:05:21 +0100 (Sun, 14 Mar 2010)
New Revision: 30065
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S29-functions.pod
Log:
the '%','mod' are the 'modulo' op; 'modulus' is either what you call the result
besides 'remainder', or it is anoth
Author: vamped
Date: 2010-03-13 12:07:29 +0100 (Sat, 13 Mar 2010)
New Revision: 30059
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S29-functions.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
Log:
changed "scalar context" into "item context" as per S02
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S29-functions.pod
=
