pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-11-19 05:34:29 +0100 (Thu, 19 Nov 2009)
New Revision: 29129
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S04-control.pod
Log:
[S04] as several folks have suggested, rename "blorst" to "blast"
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S04-control.pod
==
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-11-19 05:34:29 +0100 (Thu, 19 Nov 2009)
New Revision: 29129
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S04-control.pod
Log:
[S04] as several folks have suggested, rename "blorst" to "blast"
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S04-control.pod
=
Moritz Lenz wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:33:35AM -0800, Darren Duncan wrote:
For example, say I want the following expression to result in a FatRat
because presumably that's the only type which will represent the result
value exactly:
45207196 * 10 ** -37
How should that be spelled ou
Moritz Lenz wrote:
>> Given the above, if one wants to construct a full-precision rational
>> value in terms of 3 Int values analogous to a mantissa and radix and
>> exponent, what is the best way to write it in Perl 6?
>>
>> For example, say I want the following expression to result in a FatRat
>>
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 03:08:59AM -0800, Ron wrote:
: > +Although most rational implementations normalize or "reduce" fractions
: > +to their smallest representation immediately through a gcd algorithm,
: > +Perl allows a rational datatype to do so lazily at need, such as
: > +whenever the denomin
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-11-18 19:51:35 +0100 (Wed, 18 Nov 2009)
New Revision: 29128
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
Log:
[S02] more Rat-to-Str fine-tuning wrt negative denominators
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
=
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
> +The C<.perl> method will produce a decimal number if the denominator is
> +a multiple of 10. Otherwise it will normalize and return a rational
> +literal of the form -47/3.
Did you mean "a power of 10" instead? I can't see how it makes sense
right now.
Thi
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-11-18 19:05:37 +0100 (Wed, 18 Nov 2009)
New Revision: 29127
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
Log:
[S02] correction from ron.koerner++ on s/multiple/power/
adopt 2's and 5's factoring as normative for both .Str and .perl of Rats
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits
> +Although most rational implementations normalize or "reduce" fractions
> +to their smallest representation immediately through a gcd algorithm,
> +Perl allows a rational datatype to do so lazily at need, such as
> +whenever the denominator would run out of precision, but avoid the
> +overhead ot
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:33:35AM -0800, Darren Duncan wrote:
> Acknowledging that 'FatRat' is current name for above 'Ratio' ...
>
> pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
>> -For applications that really need arbitrary precision denominators
>> -as well as numerators, C may be used, which is defin
On behalf of the Parrot team, I'm proud to announce Parrot 1.8.0
"Zygodactyly".
Parrot, http://parrot.org/, is a virtual machine aimed at running
all dynamic languages.
Parrot 1.8.0 is available on Parrot's FTP site
ftp://ftp.parrot.org/pub/parrot/releases/devel/1.8.0/, or follow the
download in
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Darren Duncan wrote:
> Acknowledging that 'FatRat' is current name for above 'Ratio' ...
>
> pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
>>
>> -For applications that really need arbitrary precision denominators
>> -as well as numerators, C may be used, which is defined as
Acknowledging that 'FatRat' is current name for above 'Ratio' ...
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
-For applications that really need arbitrary precision denominators
-as well as numerators, C may be used, which is defined as C.
+For applications that really need arbitrary precision denomina
13 matches
Mail list logo
