On Thursday, 27. August 2009 23:58:51 Jon Lang wrote:
> It might also be nice to have a stringifying version; perhaps 'be',
> using the same "everything's an acronym" naming convention used by
> other stringifying operators (e.g., 'lt' is "less than", 'le' is 'less
> than or equal to', 'leg' is "le
> "Michael" == Michael Zedeler writes:
Michael> The Range 1.0001 .. 2.15 makes sense as an interval definition, but
Michael> there can hardly be a useful list definition without defining a step
Michael> size, at least, making it possible to use step sizes less than one.
>>
>> The obvious (de
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-08-28 17:41:35 +0200 (Fri, 28 Aug 2009)
New Revision: 28098
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
Log:
[S03] qualify "longer" to mean graphemes for pmichaud++
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
===
> "Karl" == Karl Brodowsky writes:
Karl> - or should there be a new numeric type similar to Rat that is always
Karl> having powers of 10 as denominator (like BigDecimal in Java or
Karl> LongDecimal for Ruby or decimal in C# or so)?
If so, please use something compatable with ieee 754 decima