On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Darren Duncan wrote:
Speaking of libraries, I already implemented a table type ... it's called
Set::Relation/::V2 and its on CPAN right now ... for Perl 5 ... I still have
to port it to Perl 6, unless someone else wants to do that, but I designed it
so that would be easy to
On Mar 19, 2009, at 2:35 PM, Andy Lester wrote:
I love love LOVE starting to get people together to talk about Perl
6. It's a crucial step in letting people know that Perl 6 is real.
However, starting social groups that say they are specifically about
Perl 6 makes me uncomfortable.
I th
-- Forwarded message --
From: Carl Mäsak
Date: Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 9:30 AM
Subject: Re: Multi-Dimensional arrays
To: Peter Schwenn
Peter (>):
> I've had inconsistent/incorrect results, once having created an array
> of array of arrays, both while addressing elements in it as
> @
-- Forwarded message --
From: Peter Schwenn
Date: Apr 4, 2009 3:14 PM
Subject: Re: Multi-Dimensional arrays
To: Carl Mäsak
I've had inconsistent/incorrect results, once having created an array
of array of arrays, both while addressing elements in it as
@A[l][m][n]=x and as @a[
I don't think an array of hashes and a hash of arrays could perfectly
represent a Table type.
There are several important facts of a relational model:unordered
columns and tupples, various constraints on columns. E.g. how can we
represent multi-unique constraints as an array of hashes?
On 4/4/09,
