Author: wayland
Date: 2009-03-31 07:07:01 +0200 (Tue, 31 Mar 2009)
New Revision: 26034
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/IO.pod
Log:
S32/IO: Based on some suggestions of bacek++ and skids++, I refined the
initialisation of
the $.Listening attribute. This may need more discussion
Author: wayland
Date: 2009-03-31 06:29:09 +0200 (Tue, 31 Mar 2009)
New Revision: 26033
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/IO.pod
Log:
S32/IO: Added a .new() method to IO::Socket::Unix
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/IO.pod
=
Author: wayland
Date: 2009-03-31 06:22:47 +0200 (Tue, 31 Mar 2009)
New Revision: 26032
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/IO.pod
Log:
S32/IO: Made calls to .new() a bit more consistent with each other.
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/IO.pod
=
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Mark J. Reed wrote:
> > ( $a <= any(-1,+1) <= $b ) == ( $a <= any(-1,+1) && any(-1,+1) <= $b
> > )
>
> Clearly, the RHS is true for $a == $b == 0, but I'm not sure the LHS
> shouldn't also be. Isn't it just syntactic sugar for the RHS?
I suspect not. Rather I think th
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Martin D Kealey
wrote:
> This would certainly be false:
>
> ( $a <= any(-1,+1) <= $b ) == ( $a <= any(-1,+1) && any(-1,+1) <= $b )
Clearly, the RHS is true for $a == $b == 0, but I'm not sure the LHS
shouldn't also be. Isn't it just syntactic sugar for the
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Jon Lang wrote:
> Here's another useful one:
>
> any($x) eqv all($x) eqv one($x) eqv $x
>
> but:
>
> none($x) !eqv $x
>
> That is, applying any, all, or one to a one-item list produces the
> equivalent to a single item. For an empty list: any() eqv all() eqv
> (). But
Author: wayland
Date: 2009-03-31 02:48:54 +0200 (Tue, 31 Mar 2009)
New Revision: 26031
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/IO.pod
Log:
S32/IO: Expanded IO::Socket, mostly at the expense of IO::Socket::INET.
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/IO.pod
=
Author: wayland
Date: 2009-03-31 02:30:46 +0200 (Tue, 31 Mar 2009)
New Revision: 26030
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/IO.pod
Log:
S32/IO:
- Merged IO::Listening into IO::Socket
- Made IO::Socket implement IO::Closeable
- Added a $.Listening attribute to IO::Sock
Here's another useful one:
any($x) eqv all($x) eqv one($x) eqv $x
but:
none($x) !eqv $x
That is, applying any, all, or one to a one-item list produces the
equivalent to a single item. For an empty list: any() eqv all() eqv
(). But what about one() and none()?
--
Jonathan "Dataweaver
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Mark Lentczner wrote:
> What I see here is that there is a tendency to want to think about, and
> operate on, the eigenstates as a Set, but this seems to destroy the "single
> value" impersonation of the Junction.
In my case, this tendency comes more from a desir
Author: wayland
Date: 2009-03-30 15:01:45 +0200 (Mon, 30 Mar 2009)
New Revision: 26025
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/IO.pod
Log:
S32/IO.pod: Changed "TCP" to "INET"
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/IO.pod
===
Em Dom, 2009-03-29 às 22:57 -0700, Mark Lentczner escreveu:
> What I see here is that there is a tendency to want to think about,
> and operate on, the eigenstates as a Set, but this seems to destroy
> the "single value" impersonation of the Junction.
> Further, if one ever calls .!eigenstates(
12 matches
Mail list logo
