Hi. I've been trying to help reorganise the draft S16, as I'm also in
the process of writing something roughly equivalent to Net::Cmd in Perl6. I
have some questions.
First question, how do IO::Encoded and eg. IO::Encoded::Readable
relate to each other? I'm assuming it's one of the follow
Author: wayland
Date: 2009-02-14 07:37:40 +0100 (Sat, 14 Feb 2009)
New Revision: 25329
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S16-io.pod
Log:
S02: Moved comment about standard file handles to S16.
S16: Did more clearing up, and fixed some stupid things I did last time
Modi
On Feb 13, 2009, at 11:50 PM, Larry Wall wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:34:03PM -0600, Chris Dolan wrote:
Argh! I submitted a patch implementing $?PROGRAM in Rakudo
literally 5
minutes before you sent this...
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63228
Indeed, why do you thin
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:34:03PM -0600, Chris Dolan wrote:
> Argh! I submitted a patch implementing $?PROGRAM in Rakudo literally 5
> minutes before you sent this...
>
> http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63228
Indeed, why do you think I fixed the spec? :)
But don't worry, we te
Author: wayland
Date: 2009-02-14 06:38:34 +0100 (Sat, 14 Feb 2009)
New Revision: 25328
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S16-io.pod
Log:
S16-io: Reorganised everything, grouping things together a bit better. This is
only a
draft; otherwise I'd be a lot more careful :).
Specifically, I've:
-
Argh! I submitted a patch implementing $?PROGRAM in Rakudo literally
5 minutes before you sent this...
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63228
Chris
On Feb 13, 2009, at 11:21 PM, pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-02-14 06:21:13 +0100 (Sat, 14 Feb 2
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-02-14 06:21:13 +0100 (Sat, 14 Feb 2009)
New Revision: 25325
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S19-commandline.pod
Log:
[S19] $?PROGRAM makes no sense
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S19-commandline.pod
===
--- docs/Per
In reading over the Debugging draft (i.e., the future S20), I ran
across the concept of the infectious trait - that is, a trait that
doesn't just get applied to the thing to which it is explicitly
applied; rather, it tends to spread to whatever else that thing comes
in contact with. "Taint" is the
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-02-14 02:31:33 +0100 (Sat, 14 Feb 2009)
New Revision: 25323
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S10-packages.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S11-modules.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S12-objects.pod
Log:
Allow use of :: as anonymous package name
Clear up more * as GLOBAL fossils
Modified: docs
On Friday, 13. February 2009 20:30:24 Larry Wall wrote:
> While taking a shower I refined the design somewhat in my head,
> thinking about the ambiguities in package names when you're redefining.
> By my previous message, it's not clear whether the intent of
>
> multi package Foo::Bar {...}
>
>
Larry Wall wrote:
> Jon Lang wrote:
> : And with package versioning, you may not need an "is instead"
> : equivalent: if you want to "redefine" a package, just create a newer
> : version of it in a tighter lexical scope than the original package was
> : in. You can still access the original packag
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:24:14AM -0800, Jon Lang wrote:
: Given that signatures have grown well beyond their origins as
: subroutine parameter lists, and given that signatures have their own
: syntax, perhaps they should be moved out of S06? I could see S08
: being retasked to address signatures
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:46:42AM -0800, Jon Lang wrote:
: And with package versioning, you may not need an "is instead"
: equivalent: if you want to "redefine" a package, just create a newer
: version of it in a tighter lexical scope than the original package was
: in. You can still access the o
Larry Wall wrote:
> Jon Lang wrote:
> : Well, we _do_ have a mechanism in place for adding to an existing
> : class (e.g., "class Foo is also { ... }"), and classes are a special
> : case of modules; so I don't see why you shouldn't be able to do
> : likewise with modules and even packages. That s
At present, signatures appear to serve at least three rather diverse
purposes in Perl 6:
* parameter lists for routines (can also be used to specify what a
given routine returns; explored in detail in S06).
* variable declaration (see "declarators" in S03).
* parametric roles (currently only addre
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 09:44:12AM -0800, Jon Lang wrote:
: TSa wrote:
: > Does that imply that packages behave like C++ namespaces? That is
: > a package can be inserted into several times:
: >
: > package A
: > {
: > class Foo {...}
: > }
: > # later elsewhere
: > package A
: >
TSa wrote:
> Does that imply that packages behave like C++ namespaces? That is
> a package can be inserted into several times:
>
> package A
> {
> class Foo {...}
> }
> # later elsewhere
> package A
> {
> class Bar {...}
> }
>
> I would think that this is just different sy
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 06:27:07PM +0100, TSa wrote:
> Does that imply that packages behave like C++ namespaces? That is
> a package can be inserted into several times:
>
>package A
>{
>class Foo {...}
>}
># later elsewhere
>package A
>{
>class Bar {...}
>
HaloO,
Jon Lang wrote:
Carl Mäsak wrote:
* A should be treated as a post-declared package.
Whatever this means, it sounds preferable. :)
It means that you can define package A without ever declaring it, by
declaring all of its contents using such statements as 'role A::B ',
'sub A::Foo', and
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 06:37:26AM -0800, dev.null.box wrote:
: Hi...
:
: I´m used to test oneliners on the perl6 irc channel when i´m at
: home... But, at work, latetly i´m having lots of free time (this week
: has been sooo boring).
:
: But, i have irc blocked at my office (and yes, i´ve tried
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 06:37, dev.null.box wrote:
> Hi...
>
> I´m used to test oneliners on the perl6 irc channel when i´m at
> home... But, at work, latetly i´m having lots of free time (this week
> has been sooo boring).
>
> But, i have irc blocked at my office (and yes, i´ve tried alternative
On Fri Oct 31 06:31:53 2008, masak wrote:
> Rakudo r32247 does the wrong thing when matching a something against
> the ".method" syntax.
>
> $ perl6 -e 'class A { method alwaystrue { return 1 } }; given A.new {
> say "irrelevant" ~~ .alwaystrue }'
> 0
>
> According to the big matching table in S0
Hi...
I´m used to test oneliners on the perl6 irc channel when i´m at
home... But, at work, latetly i´m having lots of free time (this week
has been sooo boring).
But, i have irc blocked at my office (and yes, i´ve tried alternative
ports for irc on freenode)... so, i wonder, is there is a websit
23 matches
Mail list logo
