Re: r25172 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-02-02 Thread Richard Hainsworth
Daniel Ruoso wrote: Em Seg, 2009-02-02 às 09:37 -0800, Larry Wall escreveu: It's also not clear how this should interact with buffering systems like stdio. But in any case, speaking directly to the IO stack is likelier to give consistent results than playing mix-n-match with various calls on

Re: r25172 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-02-02 Thread Daniel Ruoso
Em Seg, 2009-02-02 às 15:12 -0800, Larry Wall escreveu: > Roles are good, but what is this Char thing of which you speak? It > seems good neither for Unicode characters nor for keystroke sequences. :) I meant exactly in the sense of providing one of those abstractions, let me rephrase it: role

Re: r25172 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-02-02 Thread Larry Wall
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 07:47:33PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: : Em Seg, 2009-02-02 às 09:37 -0800, Larry Wall escreveu: : > It's also not clear how this should interact with buffering systems : > like stdio. But in any case, speaking directly to the IO stack is : > likelier to give consistent resu

Re: r25172 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-02-02 Thread Daniel Ruoso
Em Seg, 2009-02-02 às 09:37 -0800, Larry Wall escreveu: > It's also not clear how this should interact with buffering systems > like stdio. But in any case, speaking directly to the IO stack is > likelier to give consistent results than playing mix-n-match with > various calls on the IO stack that

r25175 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-02-02 Thread pugs-commits
Author: lwall Date: 2009-02-02 23:36:20 +0100 (Mon, 02 Feb 2009) New Revision: 25175 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod Log: [S03] remove frivolous sub [op] form of reduce declaration &[op] always refers to a binary infix even for list associative ops Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-op

Re: r25172 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-02-02 Thread Larry Wall
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 11:00:28AM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: : Em Seg, 2009-02-02 às 13:51 +0100, Leon Timmermans escreveu: : > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:05 PM, wrote: : > > -the latter case C<$!> is set). : > > +the latter case C<$!> is set). The C<:async> flag lets the call : > > +return an und

Re: r25172 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-02-02 Thread TSa
HaloO, pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote: -our Bool method getc (IO $self: *...@list) +our Bool method getc (IO $self: Bool :async) Shouldn't there be a sigiled :$async? Regards, TSa. -- "The unavoidable price of reliability is simplicity" -- C.A.R. Hoare "Simplicity does not prece

Re: r25172 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-02-02 Thread Daniel Ruoso
Em Seg, 2009-02-02 às 13:51 +0100, Leon Timmermans escreveu: > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:05 PM, wrote: > > -the latter case C<$!> is set). > > +the latter case C<$!> is set). The C<:async> flag lets the call > > +return an undefined value if no character is immediately available. > IMHO it would b

Re: r25172 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-02-02 Thread Leon Timmermans
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:05 PM, wrote: > > =item getc > > -our Bool method getc (IO $self: *...@list) > +our Bool method getc (IO $self: Bool :async) getc returning a Bool??? > -the latter case C<$!> is set). > +the latter case C<$!> is set). The C<:async> flag lets the call > +return

r25172 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-02-02 Thread pugs-commits
Author: masak Date: 2009-02-02 13:05:20 +0100 (Mon, 02 Feb 2009) New Revision: 25172 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S16-io.pod Log: [S16] added :async flag to getc Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S16-io.pod === --- docs/Perl6/Spec/S16-io.pod

r25171 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-02-02 Thread pugs-commits
Author: masak Date: 2009-02-02 13:04:56 +0100 (Mon, 02 Feb 2009) New Revision: 25171 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S12-objects.pod Log: [S12] fixed minor typo in class name Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S12-objects.pod === --- docs/Perl6/