Author: lwall
Date: 2009-01-16 08:42:00 +0100 (Fri, 16 Jan 2009)
New Revision: 24926
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
src/perl6/STD.pm
t/operators/adverbial_modifiers.t
t/run/02-dash-n.t
t/run/03-dash-p.t
Log:
[STD] alignment with S03 on associativity noted by mtnviewmark
Mark Lentczner wrote:
> STD has sym<;> as both an infix operator ( --> Sequencer), and as a
> terminator.
> ?? Which is it? Since I think most people think of it as a statement
> terminator, I plan on leaving it off the chart.
It is both. Examples where it is used as an infix operator include:
I'm re-working my "Periodic Table of the Operators" chart to be up-to-
date. I did the first major pass based on S03-operators. However,
the last few days I've been plowing through STD.pm and have discovered
that there some differences. Since STD.pm is considered more up to
date, I'll be
Following some responses I've seen, I'll try to clarify my proposal. Basically
its like this.
A significant subset of Perl 6 native features, eg types and operators, native
meaning they are declared and described in the Perl 6 Synopsis documents, have
been implemented under Pugs by being writ
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Jon Lang wrote:
> OK, then. If I'm understanding this correctly, the problem being
> raised has to do with deciding which language features to treat as
> primitives and which ones to bootstrap from those primitives. The
> difficulty is that different compilers p
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Jonathan Scott Duff
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Jon Lang wrote:
>>
>> Forgive my ignorance, but what is a Prelude?
>>
>> --
>> Jonathan "Dataweaver" Lang
>
> The stuff you load (and execute) to bootstrap the language into utility on
> each invocation
Jon Lang wrote:
Forgive my ignorance, but what is a Prelude?
The Prelude is a file written in Perl 6 that defines some Perl 6 built-ins.
See http://perlcabal.org/svn/pugs/view/src/perl6/Prelude.pm for what AFAIK is
the newest version.
-- Darren Duncan
Forgive my ignorance, but what is a Prelude?
--
Jonathan "Dataweaver" Lang
Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
The problem with this method is that there are usually *several* ways to
implement each feature in terms of some number of other features. The
creators of the shared prelude are then stuck with the problem of
deciding which of these to use. If their choices do not matc
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 16:03 -0800, Darren Duncan wrote:
> Patrick R. Michaud wrote (on p6c):
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 08:53:33AM +0100, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> >> Another thing to keep in mind is that once we start to have a Perl 6
> >> prelude, we might decide to be nice neighbors and share it wit
Patrick R. Michaud wrote (on p6c):
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 08:53:33AM +0100, Moritz Lenz wrote:
Another thing to keep in mind is that once we start to have a Perl 6
prelude, we might decide to be nice neighbors and share it with other
implementations, as far as that's practical.
My guess is t
11 matches
Mail list logo
