Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
> And it says exactly what it's supposed to say in the absolutely
> most straightforward manner possible. The order of execution is
> crystal clear, the intent behind the loop completely explicit.
If it works for you, great! Personally, it doesn't strike me as being
as
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 01:47:08AM +0100, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
: And I just realised how to best do that in Perl 5:
:
: goto INVARIANT;
:
: while ( @stuff ) {
: $_->do_something( ++$i ) for @stuff;
:
: INVARIANT:
: @stuff = grep { $_->valid } @stuff;
: }
* David Green [2008-12-18 19:45]:
> Well, I prefer a built-in counter like that, but I thought the
> point was that you wanted some kind of block or something that
> could be syntactically distinct?
No, that would only be a means to the end. That end is simply to
not repeat myself in writing hone
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
Are there any objections if I refactor the current S22 into 3 parts,
and retain the .jib files stuff in the current S22 (renamed to
S22-package-format.pod), a document containing "what S22 said about CPAN6"
(which we could then donate to the cpan6
Author: particle
Date: 2008-12-19 01:08:34 +0100 (Fri, 19 Dec 2008)
New Revision: 24478
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S19-commandline.pod
Log:
[spec] ideas on run-time system option and environment variables; minor updates
and corrections
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S19-commandline.pod
Author: wayland
Date: 2008-12-19 01:07:24 +0100 (Fri, 19 Dec 2008)
New Revision: 24477
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S22-package-format.pod
Log:
Removed stuff about repositories and build and install software.
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S22-package-format.pod
Author: particle
Date: 2008-12-19 01:05:41 +0100 (Fri, 19 Dec 2008)
New Revision: 24475
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod
Log:
[spec] whitespace after commas is not allowed when passing multiple values to a
command-line option
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod
==
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Em Qui, 2008-12-18 às 13:08 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu:
My question is, what sort of information actually belongs in a final
version of the 6PAN spec? I'm assuming it will at least include 6PAN Package
format (layout, metadata, etc), and
Mark, am I right in putting it like this?
6PAN:
- Perl6 package format
- Client-side part of "CPAN"
CPAN6:
- Server-side part of "CPAN" (with more stuff)
Is that how you see it?
:)
-
Author: lwall
Date: 2008-12-18 22:20:36 +0100 (Thu, 18 Dec 2008)
New Revision: 24474
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S12-objects.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S29-functions.pod
Log:
[Spec] redefine WHAT to stringify to typename plus '()'
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S12-objects.pod
==
On 2008-Dec-17, at 5:15 pm, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
The way Template Toolkit solves this is far better: the loop body
gets access to an iterator object which can be queried for the
count of iterations so far and whether this is the first or last
iteration.
Well, I prefer a built-in counter l
Author: ruoso
Date: 2008-12-18 19:26:20 +0100 (Thu, 18 Dec 2008)
New Revision: 24472
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S11-modules.pod
Log:
[spec] Foo::Bar::.EXPORTALL instead of Foo::Bar.EXPORTALL
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S11-modules.pod
==
* jerry gay (jerry@gmail.com) [081218 14:01]:
> > If you understand my explanation of CPAN6, then you certainly must be
> > ware that 6PAN and CPAN6 have nothing to do with each other. Please do
> > not use them in combination. It is as silly as saying TCP/Linux
> there's a difference? that
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:51, Moritz Lenz wrote:
>> Since Perl 5 has no REPL, I'm not sure where such a spec would go. S20,
>> maybe, since the debugger is the closest thing?
>
> or maybe S19, because it defines the console interface to the rest of
> the world. Or just pick a not-yet-used number
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 05:45, Mark Overmeer wrote:
> * Daniel Ruoso (dan...@ruoso.com) [081218 13:39]:
>> Em Qui, 2008-12-18 às 13:08 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu:
>> > My question is, what sort of information actually belongs in a final
>> > version of the 6PAN spec? I'm assuming it wi
* Daniel Ruoso (dan...@ruoso.com) [081218 13:39]:
> Em Qui, 2008-12-18 às 13:08 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu:
> > My question is, what sort of information actually belongs in a final
> > version of the 6PAN spec? I'm assuming it will at least include 6PAN
> > Package
> > format (layout
Em Qui, 2008-12-18 às 13:08 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu:
> My question is, what sort of information actually belongs in a final
> version of the 6PAN spec? I'm assuming it will at least include 6PAN Package
> format (layout, metadata, etc), and I'd suggest that it also include the
>
Em Qui, 2008-12-18 às 11:38 +0100, Mark Overmeer escreveu:
> In the current state of affairs, CPAN is limited to Perl5 and strongely
> entangled by Perl5 install tools. Do we want to have people install
> Perl5 on their (maybe small) machine before they can install Perl6 stuff?
> Rpm-tools and deb
* Daniel Ruoso (dan...@ruoso.com) [081217 13:19]:
> Em Qua, 2008-12-17 às 23:35 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu:
> > On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> > > Em Qua, 2008-12-17 às 15:00 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu:
> > >> My basic assumption is that there's going to be some kind of pa
Mark J. Reed wrote:
> Following up to a bug report, Mr Lenz wrote:
>
> Another detail: if i do this in the REPL, it works fine, until I close
>> the REPL - then I get the same backtrace as before.
>>
>
> ...except that this is a Rakudo bug, and Rakudo doesn't have a REPL.
BTW there's a patch fo
20 matches
Mail list logo
