Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 11:44:05AM +0200, Moritz Lenz wrote:
>> When we write regexes, we generally capture stuff in a way that makes
>> the following semantic analysis easier. For example we could have a
>> regex m/ + ? */ if we're only interested in the match
>> trees
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 11:44:05AM +0200, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> When we write regexes, we generally capture stuff in a way that makes
> the following semantic analysis easier. For example we could have a
> regex m/ + ? */ if we're only interested in the match
> trees of what and matches, not their
When we write regexes, we generally capture stuff in a way that makes
the following semantic analysis easier. For example we could have a
regex m/ + ? */ if we're only interested in the match
trees of what and matches, not their respective order.
But if you want to re-used the match tree for som
