On 2008 Oct 1, at 22:23, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On 2008 Oct 1, at 22:14, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
Hi all. I've enjoyed(?) reading over the February/March thread
entitled "Musings on operator overloading". I've brought a few
thoughts al
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On 2008 Oct 1, at 22:14, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
Hi all. I've enjoyed(?) reading over the February/March thread
entitled "Musings on operator overloading". I've brought a few thoughts
along; if they're old news, please tell me
here to do
On 2008 Oct 1, at 22:14, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
Hi all. I've enjoyed(?) reading over the February/March thread
entitled "Musings on operator overloading". I've brought a few
thoughts along; if they're old news, please tell me
here to do more reading on it :).
The Perl6 way to do this i
Hi all. I've enjoyed(?) reading over the February/March thread
entitled "Musings on operator overloading". I've brought a few thoughts
along; if they're old news, please tell me where to do more reading on it :).
Over the last year or two, I've discovered XPath. I've always thought
XML a
Author: larry
Date: Wed Oct 1 12:54:11 2008
New Revision: 14585
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
Revision to accumulator semantics so that -= dwims
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/
Author: larry
Date: Wed Oct 1 10:17:47 2008
New Revision: 14584
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
typo from Bob Rogers++
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod(o
Author: larry
Date: Wed Oct 1 09:55:35 2008
New Revision: 14583
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
Describe how assignment metaoperators initialize undefined lvalues.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
HaloO,
one nifty thing could be negation propagation in chained
comparisons: ($a ne $b ne $c) === !($a eq $b || $b eq $c).
This again insures some sanity if any of $a, $b or $c are
junctions. BTW, the boolean connectives &&, || and ^^ shouldn't
be auto-threaded through junctions.
Regards, TSa.
HaloO,
Martin D Kealey wrote:
Surely it is more important that ($a ne $b) should be equivalent to not( $a
eq $b ) regardless of whether either variable contains a junction?
IIRC, ne is just an abbreviation of !eq where ! in turn as a meta
operator means to pull the negation to the front. Are j
