Re: "All classes imply the existence of a role of the same name."

2008-05-07 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 12:21:27PM -0700, chromatic wrote: > On Friday 02 May 2008 11:55:54 Larry Wall wrote: > > > On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 11:15:34AM -0700, chromatic wrote: > > > : All classes imply the existence of a role of the same name. > > > If a role is derived from a class, it must of

[svn:perl6-synopsis] r14541 - doc/trunk/design/syn

2008-05-07 Thread larry
Author: larry Date: Wed May 7 09:07:46 2008 New Revision: 14541 Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod Log: [S05] better characterize Match and Cursor methods Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod == --- doc/trunk/

Re: Minimal Distance (Re: Where is "Manhattan Dispatch" discussion?)

2008-05-07 Thread Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
On 2008 May 7, at 4:21, TSa wrote: BTW, what is a flack? He's using "flak" (shrapnel; usual usage "catching flak over ...") without understanding it. Coming back to how C++ handles static overloading. How is the sort order of (int *), (int &), (int), (const int *), (const int &), (const

Re: Minimal Distance (Re: Where is "Manhattan Dispatch" discussion?)

2008-05-07 Thread Austin Hastings
TSa wrote: BTW, what is a flack? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flak_%28disambiguation%29 Originally, (FL)ug(a)bwehr (K)anone -- German 88mm anti-aircraft cannon of WWII. Subsequently, any anti-air gun or cannon, particularly when fired at a position rather than aimed at a particular

Re: Minimal Distance (Re: Where is "Manhattan Dispatch" discussion?)

2008-05-07 Thread TSa
HaloO, John M. Dlugosz wrote: When I mentioned this before, there was big flack over mentioning the way C++ did it. I think that must have been miscommunicated, since I wasn't even talking about summing all the arguments when he brought up "Manhattan dispatch". That he there being me, I jus

Re: MMD thoughts 2008

2008-05-07 Thread TSa
HaloO, Buddha Buck wrote: Is this right? (E,D,D) to (A,C,C) is (4,1,1), with a L1 metric of 6. (E,D,D) to (D,A,A) is (1,3,3) with an L1 metric of 7. Are you sure (E,D,D) would bind to (D,A,A)? Oh, shit. I fail with the simplest of mathematics. Indeed (E,D,D) binds to (D,A,A). The problem I w