On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 2:29 AM, Mark J. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 2:26 AM, Chas. Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It looks like they already have a name in S04: Closure traits*.
> >
> > * http://dev.perl.org/perl6/doc/design/syn/S04.html#Closure_traits
>
>
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 2:26 AM, Chas. Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It looks like they already have a name in S04: Closure traits*.
>
> * http://dev.perl.org/perl6/doc/design/syn/S04.html#Closure_traits
I don't know, it seems like any value might happen to both be a
closure and have traits
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 2:16 AM, Mark J. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> JMD> Consider the words that may be used to introduce a block for a special
> JMD> purpose, like
> JMD>
> JMD> BEGIN
> JMD> END
> JMD> INIT
> JMD> CATCH
> JMD> etc.
> JMD>
> JMD> What do you call those?
>
> W
JMD> Consider the words that may be used to introduce a block for a special
JMD> purpose, like
JMD>
JMD> BEGIN
JMD> END
JMD> INIT
JMD> CATCH
JMD> etc.
JMD>
JMD> What do you call those?
Well, lessee. The Common Lisp spec calls them "situations" in the
definition of (eval-when)...
JMD> They
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 1:31 AM, John M. Dlugosz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Consider the words that may be used to introduce a block for a special
> purpose, like
>
> BEGIN
> END
> INIT
> CATCH
> etc.
>
> What do you call those? They are not even "special named blocks" because
> that is no
Consider the words that may be used to introduce a block for a special
purpose, like
BEGIN
END
INIT
CATCH
etc.
What do you call those? They are not even "special named blocks"
because that is not the block name (that already means something).
--John
I've been working hard on re-organizing the S\d\d docs and other lore into a
technical
specification with an outline suitable for the contents.
But lately I've done some "original work" on what strong typing means and the
detailed
semantics of having types.
So, please take a look at section 10
HaloO,
Larry Wall wrote:
It's also possible I'm just nuts, and slice context should be a purely
run-time activity.
Reading your explanation of array slice context I missed an
answer to the question how the shape of an array is split
into the contexts of functions called inside .[]. I guess
the
John M. Dlugosz wrote:
> I'm taking a stab at turning the S\d\d documents into a formal standard.
That's certainly a nice idea, and much work. ++ for taking it.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
