Multiline comments in Perl6

2007-12-29 Thread Christian Mueller
Hello list, i don't know the actually state in the discussion about multiline comments, but i would propose an idea.. a combination of POD's = and the traditional route char... =# this is a multi line comment #= =# comment #= this is not commented What you think about it? regards Christian

Re: Perl6::Doc # Hail to the new pharao

2007-12-29 Thread Jonathan Scott Duff
You have my permission as well. -Scott On Dec 29, 2007 7:04 AM, herbert breunung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > thanks to chromatic, so i have ask Jonathan Scott Duff, Phil Crow and > wait for /Adrianos answer. > > what i yesterday also forgot to mention is that rumor says that the > emerald tabl

Re: Official Perl 6 and Parrot wikis

2007-12-29 Thread chromatic
On Saturday 29 December 2007 13:35:00 Mark J. Reed wrote: > Ok, consider me duly chastised. Sorry for the sidetracking. It's not a *bad* idea, but it's less important in my mind than getting useful information on the wiki. Anyone who wants to pursue it can do so, but I'd like to forestall a l

Re: Official Perl 6 and Parrot wikis

2007-12-29 Thread Mark J. Reed
Ok, consider me duly chastised. Sorry for the sidetracking. On 12/29/07, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 29 December 2007 06:56:45 Mark J. Reed wrote: > > > Maybe it's just me, but it > > seems like it will just feed the all-too-common perception that Perl > > is for CGI scrip

Re: Official Perl 6 and Parrot wikis

2007-12-29 Thread chromatic
On Saturday 29 December 2007 06:56:45 Mark J. Reed wrote: > Maybe it's just me, but it > seems like it will just feed the all-too-common perception that Perl > is for CGI scripts, and "real" web apps need to be written in > something else (be it Java, PHP, Ruby/Rails, whatever). Proposed new rule

Re: Official Perl 6 and Parrot wikis

2007-12-29 Thread Gabor Szabo
On Dec 29, 2007 4:56 PM, Mark J. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > .cgi? Is that really a CGI-based implementation? Because that seems > a little, I don't know, backward-looking. Maybe it's just me, but it > seems like it will just feed the all-too-common perception that Perl > is for CGI script

Re: Official Perl 6 and Parrot wikis

2007-12-29 Thread Mark J. Reed
.cgi? Is that really a CGI-based implementation? Because that seems a little, I don't know, backward-looking. Maybe it's just me, but it seems like it will just feed the all-too-common perception that Perl is for CGI scripts, and "real" web apps need to be written in something else (be it Java,

Re: Perl6::Doc # Hail to the new pharao

2007-12-29 Thread herbert breunung
thanks to chromatic, so i have ask Jonathan Scott Duff, Phil Crow and wait for /Adrianos answer. what i yesterday also forgot to mention is that rumor says that the emerald tables are designed to can provide answer for people on over 100 different levels of consciousness. to teach the newbeee

Re: Perl6::Doc # Hail to the new pharao

2007-12-29 Thread chromatic
On Friday 28 December 2007 17:04:40 herbert breunung wrote: > I have also plans to add my perl article (once they transelated) for $foo > perl magazine and maybe some perl.com articles, if chomatic allowes. It's fine with O'Reilly, as long as the authors of the articles agree (they hold the copy

Perl6::Doc # Hail to the new pharao

2007-12-29 Thread herbert breunung
Hereby I declare myself as the Pharao of the Perl 6 Documentation. My first sign of regence will be most probably tomorrow the release the initial stable release of http://search.cpan.org/~lichtkind/Perl6-Doc/ this is a perly command line tool to read perl 6 related documentation. The code w