I do think It Would Be Nice If there were a native Perl6
DRY/MVC/OMG/WTF/BBQ webapp dev framework ready to go (go where? into a
webapp-oriented P6 distro, natch) around the same time that the lang
itself is done.
I imagine a port of Catalyst would fit the bill nicely.
I mention this only because I
> @@ -264,17 +264,34 @@
> The C<.next> and C<.last> methods take an optional argument giving
> the final value of that loop iteration. So the old C
> syntax is still allowed but is really short for C using
> -indirect object syntax.
> +indirect object syntax. Any block object can be used, not
Author: larry
Date: Fri Dec 7 16:58:49 2007
New Revision: 14473
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
Log:
More loop control tweakage.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
> @@ -260,6 +260,11 @@
> @evens = ($_ * 2 if .odd for 0..100);
>
> Loop modifiers C, C, and C also work as in Perl5.
> +However, the labelled forms use method call syntax: C, etc.
> +The C<.next> and C<.last> methods take an optional argument giving
> +the final value of that loop iteration.
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 11:25:14PM +, Andy Armstrong wrote:
> On 7 Dec 2007, at 23:19, Chas. Owens wrote:
>> That is my take on it: "Everything is bigger in Texas", even French
>> Quotes.
>
>
> You know, from a complete outsider's perspective, I really prefer the
> Paris, Texas explanation :)
Author: larry
Date: Fri Dec 7 15:26:16 2007
New Revision: 14472
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
Log:
Some clarification of break semantics requested by dataweaver++
Generalize next, last, and break to use LABEL.leave($retval) syntax.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
===
On 7 Dec 2007, at 23:19, Chas. Owens wrote:
That is my take on it: "Everything is bigger in Texas", even French
Quotes.
You know, from a complete outsider's perspective, I really prefer the
Paris, Texas explanation :)
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
On Dec 7, 2007 5:46 PM, Thom Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
snip
> But, back to Perl I didn't get an answer to my follow-up question:
>
> So, it's because <> is so much bigger than «this», "this", or 'this'?
snip
That is my take on it: "Everything is bigger in Texas", even French Quotes.
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 02:47:05AM +0100, Juerd Waalboer wrote:
: Jonathan Lang skribis 2007-12-06 16:36 (-0800):
: > > I know it used to be that way back near the Dawn of Time, but methods
: > > don't automatically topicalize anymore unless you explicitly name
: > > one of the parameters '$_':
: >
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 04:36:26PM -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote:
: Larry Wall wrote:
: > On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 08:40:10AM -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote:
: > : or (I think):
: > :
: > : method test ($value) {
: > : setup();
: > : when $value { doit() } #[smart-match the calling object $_ agai
On Dec 7, 2007 11:50 AM, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 12:12:36PM -0700, Thom Boyer wrote:
> > Larry Wall wrote:
> >> Good guess, but no. It comes from the fact that Texas always bragged
> >> about how they were the largest state in the union, and had the biggest
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 12:12:36PM -0700, Thom Boyer wrote:
> Larry Wall wrote:
>> Good guess, but no. It comes from the fact that Texas always bragged
>> about how they were the largest state in the union, and had the biggest
>> everything, including ten-gallon hats. That was before we added Ala
12 matches
Mail list logo
