Author: larry
Date: Fri Apr 27 17:23:07 2007
New Revision: 14388
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
Log:
apostropheo from masoch++
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 05:08:49PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: larry
> Date: Fri Apr 27 17:08:44 2007
> New Revision: 14386
> +The final C<::> is required here, because the C syntax
> +is reserved for defining an autovivifiable protoobject along with
> +it's initialization closure (s
Author: larry
Date: Fri Apr 27 17:15:33 2007
New Revision: 14387
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
Log:
minor rewording
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod(original
Author: larry
Date: Fri Apr 27 17:08:44 2007
New Revision: 14386
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S12.pod
Log:
more cleanup from TheDamian++
the ugly ::Animal initializers to .bless are gone; named args only bind params
sub-blesses are now just initialized using o
On 4/27/07, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Are you sure you want to guarantee left-to-right starting
: position order? If there are multiple processors available, and
: in a lazy context, it may be preferrable to not guarantee any
: order. Then, if one processor that starts at a later
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 03:57:41PM -0400, John Macdonald wrote:
: On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 08:46:04AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: > +The matches are guaranteed to be returned in left-to-right order with
: > +respect to the starting positions. The order within each starting
: > +position is no
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 08:46:04AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> +The matches are guaranteed to be returned in left-to-right order with
> +respect to the starting positions. The order within each starting
> +position is not guaranteed and may depend on the nature of both the
> +pattern and the
Author: larry
Date: Fri Apr 27 08:46:01 2007
New Revision: 14385
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod
Log:
Correction noted by bsb++
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod
Hi,
Is the ordering of the output of this example in S05 correct?
( http://perlcabal.org/syn/S05.html#Modifiers )
$str = "abracadabra";
if $str ~~ m:exhaustive/ a (.*) a / {
say "@()";# br brac bracad bracadabr c cad cadabr d dabr br
}
I assume that there is an ordering
