On Sunday 25 February 2007 12:40, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
> What backends support packed native arrays at this point? And what's
> the performance like?
Parrot does have ManagedStruct and UnManagedStruct PMCs for mapping complex C
structures. The syntax to define them is a little grotty, but
On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 14:16 -0800, chromatic wrote:
> On Sunday 25 February 2007 13:57, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
>
> > I'm not trying to say that the implementors should rush either, nor am I
> > complaining about current status; I grok the dynamics of volunteer code.
> > I merely disagree with t
Jonathan Lang writes:
> Smylers wrote:
>
> > Richard Hainsworth writes:
> >
> > > When does the specification of perl6 come to an end?
> >
> > At a guess: when it's implemented.
> >
> > Many of the recent changes have been made by Larry in response to his
> > trying to write the grammar, and e
On Sunday 25 February 2007 13:57, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
> I'm not trying to say that the implementors should rush either, nor am I
> complaining about current status; I grok the dynamics of volunteer code.
> I merely disagree with the "spec is all-important" crowd. I personally
> have a prefe
On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 13:26 -0800, chromatic wrote:
> On Sunday 25 February 2007 12:56, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
>
> > As I mentioned in another thread, but didn't make clear in that email: I
> > don't need a "finished" spec. I need the *current* version of spec to
> > actually be mostly impleme
On Sunday 25 February 2007 12:56, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
> As I mentioned in another thread, but didn't make clear in that email: I
> don't need a "finished" spec. I need the *current* version of spec to
> actually be mostly implemented.
The implementors want the same thing.
> And if it's no
On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 12:15 -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote:
> I submit that you'll have even more luck discouraging such things if
> you can give a reasonable and believable timeline as to when the 6.0
> spec will be ready and perl 6.1 features can start being considered.
As I mentioned in another thr
What backends support packed native arrays at this point? And what's
the performance like?
Native access to packed arrays is the big thing I'm looking for before I
port a pile of source filtered Perl 5 code to Perl 6. It's a simple 3D
engine, so all of the libraries I need to work with want to w
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 09:42:22AM +0300, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
: When does the specification of perl6 come to an end? Are there criteria
: or milestones which define that the perl6 specification stage is at an end?
It seems you are presuming a Waterfall model of development here.
We're not d
Smylers wrote:
Richard Hainsworth writes:
> When does the specification of perl6 come to an end?
At a guess: when it's implemented.
Many of the recent changes have been made by Larry in response to his
trying to write the grammar, and encountering problems.
With all due respect:
Once the gra
Richard Hainsworth writes:
> When does the specification of perl6 come to an end?
At a guess: when it's implemented.
Many of the recent changes have been made by Larry in response to his
trying to write the grammer, and encountering problems.
> Perhaps there could be a perl6.0 specification, wi
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 09:42:22AM +0300, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
>
> While perl6 remains unstable in its specification (or is perceived to be
> that way) and is looking (from outside a select group?) like a unending
> road, wont this act as a deterrent to those who want to help hack it
> int
or include a disclaimer that they are outdated as juerd sugested,
or do both. anyway this is an issue since google finds the A and E first.
im really intrested if im with juerd the only one here seeing this as an
issue.
thanks
herbert
proton-ce.sf.net
> herbert (>), Richard (>>):
> > >(eg. How o
herbert (>), Richard (>>):
>(eg. How out of date are the Exegesis files?)
very *g* just use the synopsis *g*
Hm, it might actually be a good idea to port the code examples from
the Exegeses to current Perl6, preferably also runnable in Pugs. The
ported programs could be put under examples/ in
hi richard
>(eg. How out of date are the Exegesis files?)
very *g* just use the synopsis *g*
herbert
(proton-ce.sf.net)
___
Viren-Scan für Ihren PC! Jetzt für jeden. Sofort, online und kostenlos.
Gleich testen! http://www.pc-
On Saturday 24 February 2007 22:42, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> But while perl6 continues
> its evolution, without a tangible end, few are going to dedicate time
> and effort to write documentation for such as me. (eg. How out of date
> are the Exegesis files?)
You could make a very similar argum
When does the specification of perl6 come to an end? Are there criteria
or milestones which define that the perl6 specification stage is at an end?
I can see that setting a time line is not easy because the effort is
volunteer based, but what about a "conceptual" end?
Perhaps there could be a
17 matches
Mail list logo
