On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 10:24:55PM +, Smylers wrote:
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
:
: > New Revision: 13495
: >doc/trunk/design/syn/S12.pod
: >
: > +In addition to C, the special functions C,
: > +C, C, and C dispatch to the next
: > +candidate, possibly with a new argument list, and if th
Author: larry
Date: Wed Dec 20 18:42:50 2006
New Revision: 13497
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
Made Range objects smarter about transforms.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/design
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> New Revision: 13495
>doc/trunk/design/syn/S12.pod
>
> +In addition to C, the special functions C,
> +C, C, and C dispatch to the next
> +candidate, possibly with a new argument list, and if the "next"
> +variant is used, without returning:
> +
> +callsame;
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 10:26:41AM -0600, Jonathan Rockway wrote:
: Ovid wrote:
: (reversed the message a bit)
: > is 'b', any('a' .. 'h'), 'junctions should work';
:
: This looks like a Test "bug"; it's doing something like:
:
:is 'b', 'a' # not ok
:is 'b', 'b' # ok
:is 'b', 'c' #
Ovid wrote:
(reversed the message a bit)
> is 'b', any('a' .. 'h'), 'junctions should work';
This looks like a Test "bug"; it's doing something like:
is 'b', 'a' # not ok
is 'b', 'b' # ok
is 'b', 'c' # not ok
...
If you write:
ok 'b' === any('a'..'h')
The result is one passing
HaloO,
Larry Wall wrote:
Then we'd write our "done_by" role above as:
role Num-1.3-JRANDOM does STD:Num does Complex;
method re (--> STD:Num) { self }
method im (--> STD:Num) { 0.0 }
The first issue I see with this approach is that we get one
more contender for the plain name Comp
