Jonathan Lang wrote:
What got me thinking about this was that I couldn't find decent
documentation about Capture literals in the synopses.
Are Capture literals going to replace or unify the "assuming"/"currying"
behaviors?
=Austin
在 Sep 22, 2006 10:36 PM 時，Patrick R. Michaud 寫到：
Out of curiosity, why not:
/ bar bar $:=(+)/
and then one can easily look at $.from and $.to, as well
as get to the arrayed elements? (There are other possibilities as
well.)
I'm not arguing in favor of or against the proposal, just point
Author: audreyt
Date: Sun Sep 24 06:12:58 2006
New Revision: 12348
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
Log:
* S06: Squash two remaining "*f" into "|(f)".
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/desi
