Author: larry
Date: Fri Sep 15 18:48:48 2006
New Revision: 12090
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S12.pod
Log:
repairing some splat damage
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod
At 4:26 PM -0700 9/15/06, Larry Wall wrote:
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 03:27:40PM -0700, Darren Duncan wrote:
: As I recall, we're allowed to put absolutely any characters we want
: in an identifier if it is a delimited identifier rather than a
: bareword identifier.
I have no clue what you mean by
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 03:27:40PM -0700, Darren Duncan wrote:
: As I recall, we're allowed to put absolutely any characters we want
: in an identifier if it is a delimited identifier rather than a
: bareword identifier.
I have no clue what you mean by 'delimited identifier'. Are you referring
Jonathan Scott Duff skribis 2006-09-15 16:50 (-0500):
> > > To which I already responded with 5: To write any prefix op as
> > > postfix, you should put it in quotes, which gives us .'-e' and .'@'
> > > and the like. (And also giving us a general way of isolating the
> > > method name from the .*
At 4:55 PM -0500 9/15/06, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 10:47:45PM +0200, Juerd wrote:
So, we discussed making -e a real method, which would imply that
> identifiers can begin with -.
As a bit of a tangent, occasionally I wish that we could use - in
identifiers instead o
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 10:47:45PM +0200, Juerd wrote:
> So, we discussed making -e a real method, which would imply that
> identifiers can begin with -.
As a bit of a tangent, occasionally I wish that we could use - in
identifiers instead of _. I'd rather type $some-long-name than
$some_long_na
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 11:28:18PM +0200, Juerd wrote:
> Larry Wall skribis 2006-09-15 14:03 (-0700):
> > To which I already responded with 5: To write any prefix op as
> > postfix, you should put it in quotes, which gives us .'-e' and .'@'
> > and the like. (And also giving us a general way of is
Larry Wall skribis 2006-09-15 14:03 (-0700):
> To which I already responded with 5: To write any prefix op as
> postfix, you should put it in quotes, which gives us .'-e' and .'@'
> and the like. (And also giving us a general way of isolating the
> method name from the .* variants, not to mention
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 10:47:45PM +0200, Juerd wrote:
: 1. Get rid of it entirely. Normal methods and/or "use Shell" fill the gap.
: 2. Install it as a prefix op, not as a postfix op. To get to $_, write
:-e $_ explicitly.
: 3. Install these as prefix ops, and as postfix ops, but not as a gene
Aaron Sherman skribis 2006-09-15 15:28 (-0400):
> I didn't see this going back, sorry if I missed someone sending the mail.
Sorry. I promised to do it, but have so far lacked tuits and more or
less forgot all about it. Thanks for bringing it up!
> There was a discussion on IRC on Sept 9th about t
I didn't see this going back, sorry if I missed someone sending the mail.
There was a discussion on IRC on Sept 9th about the -X filetest
operators between at least audreyt, Juerd, myself and markstos. The
problem with these operators was that they conflicted in some cases with
the parsing of
David Brunton wrote:
Aaron Sherman wrote:
IMHO, the golden rule of programming languages should be: if you
need a namespace, create one.
Is there any reason these "meta" methods could not be part of some
default function package like Math::Basic and Math::Trig? The
package could be called
Author: larry
Date: Fri Sep 15 08:38:58 2006
New Revision: 12006
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
Log:
smartlinkable discussion of bindables on while and repeat while
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
==
-
13 matches
Mail list logo
