At 6:25 PM -0700 7/8/06, Darren Duncan wrote:
At 8:32 PM -0400 7/8/06, Joe Gottman wrote:
I have one minor comment about join. You should specify its behavior when
it is passed an empty list. Does it return undef or the empty string?
I think it makes the most sense for it to return an empty
At 8:32 PM -0400 7/8/06, Joe Gottman wrote:
I have one minor comment about join. You should specify its behavior when
it is passed an empty list. Does it return undef or the empty string?
I think it makes the most sense for it to return an empty string,
which is a reasonable degenerate case
> -Original Message-
> From: Aaron Sherman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 6:05 PM
> To: Perl6 Language List
> Subject: S29 update ready
>
> I've gathered my ducks in a row, used the feedback that I've gotten so
> far, and I think I'm ready to officially update
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 06:04:40PM -0400, Aaron Sherman wrote:
: I've gathered my ducks in a row, used the feedback that I've gotten so
: far, and I think I'm ready to officially update S29. For that I need two
: things:
:
: 1) I'd really like Larry to glance over the changes and $s29.bless but
I've gathered my ducks in a row, used the feedback that I've gotten so
far, and I think I'm ready to officially update S29. For that I need two
things:
1) I'd really like Larry to glance over the changes and $s29.bless but
all comments are welcome
2) I'll need commit rights to whatever reposit
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 07:42:06AM -0700, Jonathan Lang wrote:
: Is there anything that you can do with a sub (first parameter being
: some sort of object) that you cannot do with a method? Frex, given:
:
: multi method my_method($invocant:);
:
: would
:
: &topical_call := &my_method.assuming
Is there anything that you can do with a sub (first parameter being
some sort of object) that you cannot do with a method? Frex, given:
multi method my_method($invocant:);
would
&topical_call := &my_method.assuming :invocant<$_>;
be legal?
--
Jonathan "Dataweaver" Lang
