"interpolative context" ment the perl 5 side, where the double quotes should
cause interpolation. Maybe not the best phrase to identify it, now that you
mention it.
Sage
On 6/6/06, Aaron Crane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sage La Torra writes:
> http://infohost.nmt.edu/~slatorra/conversionstageo
Can someone explain to me how } on a line on its own can end a statement
(as described in the second section of S04), but the following still
works?
if $condition
{
...
}
else
{
...
}
i.e. Why doesn't the } on the fourth line terminate the if statement,
leaving the compiler terminally confuse
I only vaguely recall the discussions a while back about what
smart-matching against Booleans should do. IIRC, there are two
positions, and a good argument for either side:
C<$foo ~~ True> means C; C<$foo ~~ False> means C
or
C<$foo ~~ True> means C; C<$foo ~~ False> means C
The first of these ad
Sage La Torra writes:
> http://infohost.nmt.edu/~slatorra/conversionstageone.txt
You say this:
-Hash in interprative context: "%hash" -> "%hash{}" (also @{[...]} ->
{...})
Hashes don't interpolate in Perl 5, so that's not an issue (unless I'm
misunderstanding what you meant). But using "{.
