Jonathan Scott Duff skribis 2006-04-25 23:35 (-0500):
> I get your point though. There's no easy way to say "match 1, 7, 12, or
> 19" with this particular syntax.
> How often does that come up in practice though? I don't think I've
> ever wanted something like that.
Quite often. A silly exampl
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 09:57:58PM -0400, Joe Gottman wrote:
> According to Synopsis 5, the repetition qualifier is now **{.} where the .
> must correspond to either an Int or a Range. This seems rather restrictive.
> Why are we not allowed a junction of Ints, for instance
>
> m/^ a*
According to Synopsis 5, the repetition qualifier is now **{.} where the .
must correspond to either an Int or a Range. This seems rather restrictive.
Why are we not allowed a junction of Ints, for instance
m/^ a**{1|3|5} $/ ; # Match 1,3, or 5 a's.
This does not seem noticeably
Author: autrijus
Date: Tue Apr 25 09:37:36 2006
New Revision: 8943
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
Log:
* S02: Cleanup provisional-call text a bit, adding some more
examples, and note that method calls are never provisional
and cannot be invalidated.
Modified: doc/trunk/d
Just saw a typo in S02: s/unrecogized/unrecognized/
"If the unrecogized subname is followed by postcircumfix:<( )>, it is
compiled as a provisional function call of the parenthesized form."
On 4/26/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: autrijus
> Date: Tue Apr 25 09:03:00 2006
Author: autrijus
Date: Tue Apr 25 09:03:00 2006
New Revision: 8942
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
Log:
* S02, 03, 04, 06: Remove all occurrence of "tuple" and replace
it with "Seq". A "Se
Author: autrijus
Date: Tue Apr 25 08:48:59 2006
New Revision: 8941
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
* S03: Cleanups.
* There's no "$s xxx" postfix form anymore -- write "$s xx *".
* "@a === @a" is sufficient to illustrate the reference-identity point,
not "[EMAIL PROTECTED] === [E
