Hello again,
In Pugs, we are currently trying to figure out how classes are
initialized with $repr types other than P6opaque. My interpretation
of S12 is that P6opaque types are initialized as follows (by default):
&new is called with named arguments, it then calls &bless passing in
'P6op
Hello all,
I have been reading the recently updated Synopsis 12, and a few
things jumped out at me. In the "Classes" section, classes are
described like this:
Classes are primarily for instance management, not code reuse.
Later in the same section the following is stated:
Every cl
On 1/9/06, Gaal Yahas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>sub use_ok($module) {
>eval "package {caller.package}; require etc.";
>}
I'd like to see a nice interface to scopes in general. That is, we
would have a "scope object" which would provide access to all the
lexical scopes and the pa
What we need to do is find a way to do this at compile time.
One way is to make use_ok a macro.
The whole thing with linkage in Perl 6 is that it's supposed to
happen at compile time so that things are overall saner, but that it
can happen at runtime if we really really mean it.
use_ok as a func
Consider use_ok from the test system. Essentially, it should be
require $module; $module.import; pass "load $module";
in its caller's context. But now that exportation is lexical, how can
use_ok be implemented? It must divert the symbols installed by &import
and have them installed in the call
