Re: Avoid the Yen Sign [Was: Re: new sigil]

2005-10-23 Thread Rob Kinyon
On 10/23/05, Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dan Kogai wrote: > > To make the matter worse, there are not just one "yen sign" in Unicode. > > Take a look at this. > > > > ¥ U+00A5 YEN SIGN > > ¥ U+FFE5 FULLWIDTH YEN SIGN > > > > Tough they look and groks the same to human, computers han

Perl 6 fears

2005-10-23 Thread Juerd
I've created pugs/docs/quickref/fears, a list of Perl 6 fears. Feel free to add your own, or fears you heard about! If you don't have committer access, ask Autrijus for it, or just reply to this message. The current list of fears is: : Frequently heard Perl 6 fears : : Fears end in exclamation

Re: Avoid the Yen Sign [Was: Re: new sigil]

2005-10-23 Thread Autrijus Tang
Dan Kogai wrote: > To make the matter worse, there are not just one "yen sign" in Unicode. > Take a look at this. > > ¥ U+00A5 YEN SIGN > ¥ U+FFE5 FULLWIDTH YEN SIGN > > Tough they look and groks the same to human, computers handle them > differently. This happened when Unicode Consortium decided

Avoid the Yen Sign [Was: Re: new sigil]

2005-10-23 Thread Dan Kogai
Maeda-san and the list members, Thank you for raising this issue and sorry for not raising this myself. On Oct 22, 2005, at 19:42 , Kaoru Maeda wrote: If we find a lot of yen sign as zip-operator in the standard library, we have a big question: "Give up either Perl6 or Windows. Which do we a

Re: new sigil

2005-10-23 Thread Kaoru Maeda
> Luke Palmer wrote: > >> limited access to system settings. >> And in those kinds of corporate environments, you're not going to be >> working with any code but code written in-house. Which means that >> nobody is going to be using Latin-1, and everyone will be using the >> ASCII synonyms. What

Re: new sigil

2005-10-23 Thread maeda
Luke Palmer wrote: >> limited access to system settings. >> And in those kinds of corporate environments, you're not going to be >> working with any code but code written in-house. Which means that >> nobody is going to be using Latin-1, and everyone will be using the >> ASCII synonyms. What's th

Re: new sigil

2005-10-23 Thread Damian Conway
Autrijus wrote: Indeed. Somehow I think this makes some sense: sub Bool eqv (|T $x, |T $y) { ... } Except that it prevents anyone from ever writing: multi sub circumfix:<| |> (Num $x) { return abs $x } multi sub circumfix:<| |> (Vec $x) { return $x.mag } which many mathemat