Atmosphere: Whooosh
Mug: Clunk
Luke's head: Thud
Luke's wall: Dum
Luke: Ow
Violence is fun!
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 19:02:49 -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
> I'm going to have some coffee mugs thrown at me for saying this, but perhaps:
>
> Generic StringNumericIdentity
>
On 7/16/05, Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm going to have some coffee mugs thrown at me for saying this, but perhaps:
>
> Generic StringNumericIdentity
>+---+---++---+
> Equality |== |
On 16 Jul 2005 12:22:31 -, David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 12:14:24 +0800, Autrijus Tang
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:24:21AM +0300, Yuval Kogman wrote:
> >> > There is a new generic comparison oper
@Larry,
I have been reading up on method resolution orders and class precedence
lists and all sort of meta-model esoteria. Which brings me to ask
myself, "How should all this be done in Perl 6?".
The current state of the prototype meta-model is that it only supports
pre-order class traversal
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 12:14:24 +0800, Autrijus Tang
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:24:21AM +0300, Yuval Kogman wrote:
>> > There is a new generic comparison operator known as ~~.
>>=20
>> ~~ is just Eq, there is also Ord
>
> Hmm, <~ and ~> for generic comparators? ;
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:14:24 +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> Hmm, <~ and ~> for generic comparators? ;)
EEK!
i think <, <=>, >, == etc are enough for the ord and Eq class -
that's what most people overload in p5 anyway.
> > and Show
>
> That is already prefix ~ for that.
How do you describe
