Re: State of Design Documents

2005-06-10 Thread Joshua Gatcomb
On 6/10/05, Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmmm. Thanks. I guess I will have to go back over the questions I > have asked and see if any decisions were rendered not relfected in > docs and be a pioneer. Ok, are there any guidelines for what should and should not be put forward as a

Re: State of Design Documents

2005-06-10 Thread Joshua Gatcomb
On 6/10/05, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This already exists -- the design documents are all available from > http://svn.perl.org/perl6/doc/trunk . And I've already volunteered > to review/apply patches to the design documents or forward them to > the appropriate people for rev

Re: State of Design Documents

2005-06-10 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 12:51:15PM -0400, Joshua Gatcomb wrote: > I know that decisions are subject to change but having the current > state of decisions in a single location (Synopses) would be a great > benefit to all. I am a firm believer in not complaining unless you > have an idea about how t

State of Design Documents

2005-06-10 Thread Joshua Gatcomb
All: Designing a language isn't easy - I get that. Opening up the design process to the entire community and filtering everyone's "good" ideas certainly doesn't make this any easier. My concern is that these difficulties are being aggravated because the design documents (Synopses) are not kept up

Parsing perl without Perl (sort of)

2005-06-10 Thread J Matisse Enzer
Adam Kennedy's new module PPI: http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2005/06/09/ppi.html http://search.cpan.org/perldoc?PPI His module attempts to implement a parser that: ... creates a "round-trip" capability, parsing a file into an internal model and back out again without moving a single white space

Re: q:e/.../ as a short cut for eval q/.../

2005-06-10 Thread Juerd
David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus) skribis 2005-06-10 9:32 (-): > Interesting. Could you provide some more information, like perhaps a message body? I personally don't think string eval should be made too easy|simple. We don't want to end up with people thinking we upgraded Tcl. Juerd --

Re: PGE error?

2005-06-10 Thread Juerd
BÁRTHÁZI András skribis 2005-06-10 10:29 (+0200): > Running it several times, one time works: matches and replaces > things to +-es, one time it not works... Randomly. Where should I send > these kind of bugs? If you have any means of testing this with PGE directly (without Pugs), do so. Other

q:e/.../ as a short cut for eval q/.../

2005-06-10 Thread David Formosa \(aka ? the Platypus\)
-- Please excuse my spelling as I suffer from agraphia. See http://dformosa.zeta.org.au/~dformosa/Spelling.html to find out more. Free the Memes.

PGE error?

2005-06-10 Thread BÁRTHÁZI András
Hi, I don't know what happens and where in the code, but... Anyway, it's strange... I have this code and input.tpl: --- 8< --- rule sp { <[ ]> } rule id { <[a..z]><[a..z0..9]>+ } sub do($match) { say $match[0]; return "+"; } my $template=slurp('i