Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> The continuing exchanges regarding junctions, and the ongoing tendency
> by newcomers to think of them and try to use them as sets, makes
> me feel that it might be worthwhile to define and publish a standard
> C class and operations sooner rather than later in Perl 6
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 07:05:41PM -0400, Jeff 'japhy' Pinyan wrote:
> >Here the leading tokens are actually "<$", "<::$", "<@", "<%", "<{", "<&",
> >and "<(", and I suspect we have " >"
> Per your second message, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> would mean >,
> right?
I think so -- at least, it seems that w
On May 26, Patrick R. Michaud said:
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 08:25:03PM -0400, Jeff 'japhy' Pinyan wrote:
I have looked through the latest
revisions of Apo05 and Syn05 (from Dec 2004) and come up with the
following list:
http://japhy.perlmonk.org/perl6/rules.txt
I'll review the list below,
I was thinking on the drive home how to write some of the File::Spec
functions in P6. I realized that it would be really neat if $*OS did
one of a bunch of mixins (maybe OS::unix, OS::win32, OS::vms, etc).
That way, you could multimethod the various functions, using junctions
and Any to provide a d
Juerd wrote:
Rod Adams skribis 2005-05-26 4:15 (-0500):
From S02: "Array and hash variable names in scalar context
automatically produce references."
Since [...] produces a scalar arrayref, we end up with an arrayref one
both sides of the =.
No.
There is no scalar context on the LH
Adam Kennedy wrote:
On the migration front, when someone ports Digest.pm to Perl6, I get
a "free" upgrade, assuming the module author was kind enough to up
the version number.
You are making a pretty huge assumption here that whoever has a
namespace in p5 CPAN has first dibs at the P6 names
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 11:03:15AM -0600, John Williams wrote:
> > I proposed the following:
> >
> > # Fifteens
> > $score += 2 * all( 15 == [EMAIL PROTECTED] any( 0 .. 4 ) } );
> >
> > * Is this syntax legal?
>
> I think so.
>
> > * Does it do what I want it to do?
>
> Definitely not.
First,
> Assuming you write the subset coroutine above, how about
>
> $score +=
> ( subsets(0..4) ==> map { 2 * (15 == [+] @[EMAIL PROTECTED]) } ==> [+] )
Working on it last night and this morning, I ended up with the
following, very similar rewrite.
sub gen_idx_powerset (Int $size is copy) returns
Stevan Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On May 25, 2005, at 5:39 AM, Piers Cawley wrote:
>> One of the 'mental apps' that's been pushing some of the things I've been
>> asking for in Perl 6's introspection system is a combined
>> refactoring/debugging/editing environment for the language.
>
>
On Wed, 25 May 2005, Rob Kinyon wrote:
> (This post references the discussion at
> http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=458728, particularly dragonchild's
> response at the bottom.)
>
> For those who don't know, cribbage is a game where each player has
> access to 4 cards, plus a community card. Vari
Hi All!
> If you want access, please let me know. I will send you a temporary
> password by e-mail, that I expect you to change the first time you get
> the chance.
May i have an account name "nemux" ? Thanks!
Marco.
Rather than answer each message in this thread individually, I'll
try to aggregate them here. Disclaimer: These are just my
interpretations of how rules are defined; I'm not the one who
decides how they *should* be defined.
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 10:55:59AM -0400, Jeff 'japhy' Pinyan wrote:
>
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 08:25:03PM -0400, Jeff 'japhy' Pinyan wrote:
> I have looked through the latest
> revisions of Apo05 and Syn05 (from Dec 2004) and come up with the
> following list:
>
> http://japhy.perlmonk.org/perl6/rules.txt
I'll review the list below, but it's also worthwhile to r
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 09:11, Piers Cawley wrote:
> Aaron Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > There are many gotchas that fall out of that. For example, you might
> > have a special role that overrides .print to handle structured data, so
> > your code says:
> >
> > my Foo $obj;
> > giv
On the migration front, when someone ports Digest.pm to Perl6, I get a
"free" upgrade, assuming the module author was kind enough to up the
version number.
You are making a pretty huge assumption here that whoever has a
namespace in p5 CPAN has first dibs at the P6 namespace of the same
name,
> Is giving "=" a higher precedence than "," still considered A Good Thing?
>
> I'm not familiar with the reasoning behind the current situation, but
> I'm struggling to come up with any good reasons for keeping it.
>
> Consider the alternative:
>
> my $a, $b = 1, 2; # $b should contain 2, not 1
Rod Adams skribis 2005-05-26 4:15 (-0500):
> From S02: "Array and hash variable names in scalar context
> automatically produce references."
> Since [...] produces a scalar arrayref, we end up with an arrayref one
> both sides of the =.
No.
There is no scalar context on the LHS of the assignme
Markus Laire wrote:
Rod Adams wrote:
TSa (Thomas Sandlaß) wrote:
You mean @a = [[1,2,3]]? Which is quite what you need for multi
dimensional arrays anyway @m = [[1,2],[3,4]] and here you use
of course @m[0][1] to pull out the 2. I'm not sure if this
automatically
makes the array multi-dim
Rod Adams wrote:
Austin Hastings wrote:
--- Rod Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
TSa (Thomas Sandlaß) wrote:
@m = [[1,2],[3,4]]
@m[0;1] is a multidim deref, referencing the 4.
Referencing the 2, I hope?
Doh!
Yes, the 2.
Really?
@m here has _single_ array-ref so
@m[0] returns that si
Rod Adams wrote:
TSa (Thomas Sandlaß) wrote:
You mean @a = [[1,2,3]]? Which is quite what you need for multi
dimensional arrays anyway @m = [[1,2],[3,4]] and here you use
of course @m[0][1] to pull out the 2. I'm not sure if this automatically
makes the array multi-dimensional to the type syst
20 matches
Mail list logo
