Juerd wrote:
According to Wikipedia there are around 400 million native English speakers
and 600 million people who have English as a second language. Should the
remaining ~5.5 billion humans be exluded from writing perl code just so that
we English speakers can understand all the code that is w
Rod Adams wrote:
Thomas Sandlaß wrote:
I'm not the junction expert, but it's said that they wrap around
indexing/slicing! So the @array[!-2] would just read @array[none(-2)]?
But how does none() get the base set where the second to last is excluded
from?
It does no such thing. It creates a new none
Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote:
IIRC, it's f) (1,2,3,4,5) >>+<< (1,2,$identity,$identity,$identity),
where $identity's value is determined by a table something like this:
In the case of &infix_circumfix_meta_operator:{'»','«'}:(List,List:&op)
there's no "upgrade"---to use the S03 term. A simple "
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 03:50:38AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> I am delighted to report that the first major milestone of Pugs, version
> 6.2.0, has been released to CPAN:
Autrijus and everyone else who has been working on Pugs,
As someone who has been following the Perl6 lists for years, I'd l
gcomnz skribis 2005-04-12 16:46 (-0700):
> [words() and trim()]
I thought split'd still split on /\s+/ by default? $string.split is easy
to use, and because join uses ' ' by default (this is my interpretation
of the /lists in scalar context/ thread), $string.split.join trims all
excess whitespace,
David Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Example:
>(1,2,3,4,5) >>+<< (1,2)
>
> Is this equivalent to:
>
> a) (1,2,3,4,5) >>+<< (1,2,undef,undef,undef) (undef padding)
> b) (1,2,3,4,5) >>+<< (1,2,1,2,1) (repetition)
> c) (1,2,3,4,5) >>+<< (1,2,2,2,2) (stretching)
> d) (1,2) >>+<< (1,2) (
