On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 12:18:45PM -0400, MrJoltCola wrote:
> I cannot say how much Perl6 will expose to the high level language.
That is what I'm wondering about. I'm sorry I was so unclear.
> Can you tell me what your idea of a "scope" is? I'm thinking a
> continuation, and if that is what you
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 08:35:30AM -0700, David Storrs wrote:
> I'm unclear on what you're looking for. Are you trying to get a way
> to do interactive coding in P6? Or the ability to "freeze" a scope
> and execute it later? Or something else?
Neither in itself. I'm looking for a way to refer t
At 10:03 AM 4/8/2005, wolverian wrote:
To get to the real topic:
In Perl 6, the generic solution to fix this (if one wants to fix it)
seems, to me, to be to add a .eval method to objects that represent
scopes. I'm not sure if scopes are first class values in Perl 6. Are
they? How do you get the cur
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 05:03:11PM +0300, wolverian wrote:
Hi wolverian,
> one day a friend asked if Perl 5 had a REPL facility.
> (Read-Eval-Print-Loop). I told him it has perl -de0, which is different
> [...]
> In Perl 6, the generic solution to fix this (if one wants to fix it)
> seems, to me,
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 11:13:42PM +0200, Steven Schubiger wrote:
> Attached is a patch that fixes a minor spelling error
> in apocalypse 5.
Applied, thanks!
Pm
Hi,
(I'm sorry if this topic has already been discussed.)
one day a friend asked if Perl 5 had a REPL facility.
(Read-Eval-Print-Loop). I told him it has perl -de0, which is different
in that it does not preserve the lexical scope across evaluated lines.
This is because eval STRING creates its ow
Attached is a patch that fixes a minor spelling error
in apocalypse 5.
Steven
--- A05.pod.origThu Apr 7 22:59:16 2005
+++ A05.pod Thu Apr 7 22:59:56 2005
@@ -2179,7 +2179,7 @@
tree of objects.
Matching against such boundaries or metadata would not be possible
-unless eth
