Ovid writes:
> You know, this should be simple and maybe I'm overlooking something
> obvious. I was trying out Pugs and my first program worked great:
>
> for 1 .. 6 -> $var {
> say $var;
> }
>
> The second version didn't:
>
> for 1 .. 6 {
> say;
> }
>
> For the life of me, I
You know, this should be simple and maybe I'm overlooking something
obvious. I was trying out Pugs and my first program worked great:
for 1 .. 6 -> $var {
say $var;
}
The second version didn't:
for 1 .. 6 {
say;
}
For the life of me, I can't recall if "say" (or "print", for th
Larry Wall wrote:
: Is a closure return type indicated with this siglet syntax, too?
:
: sub foo :(Str,Int) of :(Any) {...}
You would need :() only to group multiple siglets into a single type.
So an Any can stand on its own.
Ohh, interessting! I wanted to express a return value type that
is a su
Austin Hastings wrote:
So if $$ref gives the 'all the way down' behavior, how do I get "just
one layer down" dereferencing?
How about:
my XMLnode $x = parseXML( "file.xml" );
do_something( $x.down.down.down.item[17].up.up.body.down.down );
Details of class XMLnode and friends left as an excercise
