Larry Wall wrote:
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 01:15:52AM -0600, Rod Adams wrote:
: =item multi sub cos (?Num) returns Num
:
: =item multi method Num::cos () returns Num
It would be nice if we could just say the first implies the second.
I guess what that effectively means is that even if you take the
Ashley Winters wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 23:42:41 -0600, Rod Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ashley Winters wrote:
For documentary purposes, can we make that $radians?
multi sub cos (Num +$degrees) returns Num {
return cos :radians($degrees * PI / 180);
}
my Num $x = cos :degrees(270);
Rod Adams wrote:
Ashley Winters wrote:
For documentary purposes, can we make that $radians?
multi sub cos (Num +$degrees) returns Num {
return cos :radians($degrees * PI / 180);
}
my Num $x = cos :degrees(270);
I have changed the trig functions it to have an optional "base"
argument. (I'm opti
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 23:42:41 -0600, Rod Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ashley Winters wrote:
> >For documentary purposes, can we make that $radians?
> >
> >multi sub cos (Num +$degrees) returns Num {
> >return cos :radians($degrees * PI / 180);
> >}
> >
> >my Num $x = cos :degrees(270);
>
A. Pagaltzis writes:
> Hi all,
>
> so Guido is talking about his reasoning behind dropping lambda,
> reduce(), filter() and map() in the next generation of Python:
>
> http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=98196
>
> [Prime quote: "I think having the two choices side-by-side just
Ashley Winters wrote:
For documentary purposes, can we make that $radians?
multi sub cos (Num +$degrees) returns Num {
return cos :radians($degrees * PI / 180);
}
my Num $x = cos :degrees(270);
I have changed the trig functions it to have an optional "base"
argument. (I'm option to new names f
I've posted what I have of S29 at
http://www.rodadams.net/Perl/S29.pod
http://www.rodadams.net/Perl/S29.html
I'll leave it there until it reaches some more final state.
Currently up is the "Numerical" section, covering the math related
functions.
I'd also appreciate a review of "Obsolete" to ma
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 18:03:20 -0800, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 01:15:52AM -0600, Rod Adams wrote:
>
> : =item multi sub cos (?Num) returns Num
> :
> : =item multi method Num::cos () returns Num
>
> It would be nice if we could just say the first implies the se
Larry Wall wrote:
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 01:15:52AM -0600, Rod Adams wrote:
: Plan of attack:
:
: I'm using a recent copy of Perl 5's perlfunc as a very rough template.
: At some point, I'll drudge through the A's and S's to look for functions
: new to Perl 6. I'll try not to make up too many n
> "LW" == Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
LW> I can tell you that I want both selects to be dead, but again, I'll
LW> have to translate Perl 5 to something. But some of these things
LW> can probably be translated to things like
LW> Perl5DeprecatedEmulationDoNotUseEverEverA
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 01:15:52AM -0600, Rod Adams wrote:
: Barring objections, I'm going to attempt to compile a S29.
That's great. It's one of the many things I haven't been getting
around to doing...
: Plan of attack:
:
: I'm using a recent copy of Perl 5's perlfunc as a very rough template
> "AP" == A Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AP> [Prime quote: "I think having the two choices side-by-side just
AP> requires programmers to think about making a choice that's
AP> irrelevant for their program; not having the choice streamlines
AP> the thought process."]
it just p
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 05:12:30PM -0800, Dave Whipp wrote:
: Larry Wall wrote:
: >I don't see that this buys us anything over just shortening "sprintf"
: >to something shorter, like:
: >
: > print as '%03d %15s', $foo, $bar;
: >
: >And your argument list falls out naturally from making "as" a li
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 10:26:51PM -0600, Rod Adams wrote:
: You could easily write the above as
:
:say (($n1, $n2, $n3)».as('%d')).join;
:
: What I'm not certain about is if
:
:say ($n1, $n2, $n3)».as('%d').join;
:
: does the same thing, but I think it does.
Yes, hyper only modifies o
Larry Wall skribis 2005-03-12 16:03 (-0800):
> Just for the record, let me say that I expect the limit parameter
> to split to be +$limit and not ?$limit. I think a number of seldom-used
> options will go this route. Another consideration is whether the
> parameter needs to be considered for MMD.
A. Pagaltzis skribis 2005-03-13 23:40 (+0100):
> [Prime quote: "I think having the two choices side-by-side just
> requires programmers to think about making a choice that's
> irrelevant for their program; not having the choice streamlines
> the thought process."]
> But, philosophical point of view
Hi all,
so Guido is talking about his reasoning behind dropping lambda,
reduce(), filter() and map() in the next generation of Python:
http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=98196
[Prime quote: "I think having the two choices side-by-side just
requires programmers to think about m
17 matches
Mail list logo
