On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 04:44:41AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> * What is the value of a reference in any of the scalar contexts?
>
> Currently I'm blindly dereferencing it.
It seems that I got four out of five correct; the "blind referencing"
has an important exception in the references are
Does this make sense?
my @words = gather {
for =(open '/usr/share/dict/words' err die) {
.=chomp;
next if /<-[a-z]>/;
/$re/ and take { word => $_, score => %scores{ .letters }.sum };
}
} ==> sort { . } is descending, { ..length }, { . };
Today I have finished implementing 90% of primitive operators; Pugs can
now evaluate most simple expressions, including junctive autothreading
and magical/infinite ranges. Their implementation are in:
http://wagner.elixus.org/~autrijus/darcs/pugs/Prim.hs
As such, there are some corner cases
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 03:24:19AM -0800, Thu Trieu wrote:
> Does perl provides function to write array or hash data to file and be able
> to get them back to variable ?
I think you're asking this question in completely the wrong place.
This is a list for discussing the specifications of the yet-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, I wonder how to talk about an array that can contain elements
of any value type, but all the elements must have the same type.
Is Perl6 capable of expressing such a restraint?
Thanks,
/Autrijus/
The problem (in general) with this requirement is that it conflicts
Does perl provides function to write array or hash data to file and be able to
get them back to variable ?
This can be done easily from Vb6 for instance, please do not guide me by using
Mysql, I mean exporting to a raw "txt" file.
Somethings like below: (illustrate by php)
$a= array[1..
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 01:00:33PM +0100, Miroslav Silovic wrote:
> The problem (in general) with this requirement is that it conflicts with
> inhericance. Perl6 allows you to extend any type (using 'but' operator,
> for example) and so, any time you promise that something will be of a
> certain
"Pair", "Junction" and "Undef" are not list among Perl6's standard
types in S06. I'm assuming that they are actually basic types for now;
if that is the case, below is a patch to say that.
Thanks,
/Autrijus/
--- S06.pod.origFri Feb 4 04:29:34 2005
+++ S06.pod Fri Feb 4 19:32:53 200
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 06:04:52PM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> my @array of Array;
> my @array is Array of (Any is Array of (Any is Scalar))
>
> If so, may I consider it as equivalent to this Haskell code?
>
> class TArray baseVtype elemVtype where {- ... -} -- Array Trait
> cla
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 03:59:06PM -0800, Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote:
> Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > However, I'd still like to know whether my understanding on punning
> > (same class 'Array' used as both Implementation Type and Value Type)
> > and the validity of matching on "
10 matches
Mail list logo