Austin~
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 11:20:25 -0500, Austin Hastings
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Fowles wrote:
>
> >Perl 6 Summary for 2004-12-20 through 2005-01-03
> >
> >
> >
>
> s/conses/consensus/g ?
Indeed. Let this be a lesson to anyone who would claim that just
running spell check is enoug
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 10:31:37PM -0800, Ashley Winters wrote:
: On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 22:31:47 -0700, Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > Ashley Winters writes:
: > > sub foo (Class $who) {
: > > my $thing := $who<$var>;
: > > my &func := $who<&func>; # how would I do this otherwise
--- Jon Ericson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Austin Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > s/conses/consensus/g ?
>
> I assumed it was a Lisp reference. ;-)
contheth?
(No, I'm not really *quite* that clueless.)
Cheers,
Ovid
=
Silence is Evil
http://users.easystreet.com/ov
Austin Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> s/conses/consensus/g ?
I assumed it was a Lisp reference. ;-)
Jon
Matt Fowles wrote:
Perl 6 Summary for 2004-12-20 through 2005-01-03
s/conses/consensus/g ?
