On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 02:54:42PM -0700, John Williams wrote:
: Does / <-> / capture to $0{'-'} ?
: Or should that be written / <-«alpha»> / ?
At the moment I've got it that only assertions of the form capture.
Anything else you have to do an explicit binding, or use :keepall.
Larry
John Williams writes:
> Is all the "Extensible metasyntax (<...>)" being changed to Â... ?
>
> Or is the new rule that <...> is capturing metasyntax, and Â... is
> non-capturing metasyntax?
That's the one.
> You can't really capture anything on an assertion, so
> /^foo .* <( do { say "Got
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Larry Wall wrote:
> Here's the proposal.
>
> First the bad news:
> * We accept that the C<< < >> operator requires whitespace
> around it, and be prepared to be burned in effigy occasionally.
My biggest worry about this is that people will be writing
if $x<3
loo
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Austin Hastings wrote:
How about just having C< system() > return a clever object with .output and
.err methods?
interesting...
Michele
--
Windows shuts down automaticaly giving an count down. what could be
the problem
Windows?
- "Le TeXnicien de surface" in comp.text.tex
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote:
I like this in general. However...
Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Since we already stole angles from iterators, «$fh» is not
how you make iterators iterate. Instead we use $fh.fetch (or
whatever) in scalar context,