Mail test. Sorry.
Luke
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 07:51:29PM +, Matthew Walton wrote:
: And can I overload based on return types?
In the case of an MMD tie, the default routine could use the return
type context to break the tie. That's about the limit of what's
practical, I suspect. Possibly we could give some declar
Luke Palmer wrote:
Also, would things blow up if I specified the return types for operator
overloads, such as
multi sub *infix:Â+Â (EvilNumber $lhs, EvilNumber $rhs) returns
EvilNumber is deep { ... }
In that case I don't see why it would blow up. If you said, say:
multi sub *infix:Â*Â (Ve
Matthew Walton writes:
> However, if I alter my operator overload to be
>
> multi sub *infix:Â+Â (EvilNumber $lhs, EvilNumber $rhs) is deep { ... }
>
> I get *infix:Â+=Â defined as { $lhs = $lhs + $rhs; } for free. Is that
> right?
Yep.
> Also, would things blow up if I specified the return ty
