On Sep 23, 2004, at 5:27 PM, Edward Peschko wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 08:15:08AM -0700, Jeff Clites wrote:
>>>
>>> just like the transformation of a string into a number, and from a
>>> number to a string. Two algorithmically different things as well,
>>> but they'd damn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll show you. Here are some of the generators. This is very dense,
functional code. Read at your own risk (but I'm certainly not writing
it to be executed!).
Quite. ;)
For the regexp /a aa aaa a aa/, this would sequentially
search through all possible ways
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 09:12:32AM -0400, Buddha Buck wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:11:02 +0100, The Perl 6 Summarizer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 2004-09-17
> >Another week, another summary, and I'm running late. So:
> >
> > This week in perl6-com
On Sep 22, 2004, at 5:06 PM, Edward Peschko wrote:
How do you do that? Generation and matching are two different things
algorithmically.
yes, but they are intimately linked. just like the transformation of a
string
into a number, and from a number to a string. Two algorithmically
different
thing
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:11:02 +0100, The Perl 6 Summarizer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 2004-09-17
>Another week, another summary, and I'm running late. So:
>
> This week in perl6-compiler
>
> Bootstrapping the grammar
>Uri Guttman had some thoughts
Andrew Rodland wrote:
On Tuesday 21 September 2004 07:18 pm, Thomas A. Boyer wrote:
Larry Wall wrote:
Somebody needs to talk me out of using A..Z for the simple cases.
Larry
[ <> for array dimension placeholder ]
That might confuse users of languages that were not
C-syntax-influenced, who think th
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
Writing "pack", or something like it
Michele Dondi wondered how to write "pack"-like functions in Perl 6,
where the first argument is a string which specifies the signature of
the rest of the function call. The proposal stumped me, but may
> How do you do that? Generation and matching are two different things
> algorithmically.
yes, but they are intimately linked. just like the transformation of a string
into a number, and from a number to a string. Two algorithmically different
things as well, but they'd damn-well better be exact
