On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 19:35, Luke Palmer wrote:
> The New Way (tm) to do that would probably be sticking a role onto the
> array object with which you're dealing:
>
> my @foo does separator('//') = (1,2,3,4,5);
> say "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; # 1//2//3//4//5
Shh, no one's let slip the idea
Alexey Trofimenko writes:
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 16:06:40 -0700, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >So all of these would require curlies:
> >
> >{foo()}
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >...
>
> ah.. how poorly.. and how sufficient!.. But it's.. it's just not quite
> like in perl5.. But
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 16:06:40 -0700, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually, I've been rethinking this whole mess since last week, and
am seriously considering cranking up the Ruby-o-meter here just a tad.
At the moment I'm inclined to say that the *only* interpolators in
double quotes are:
Larry wrote:
Actually, I've been rethinking this whole mess since last week, and
am seriously considering cranking up the Ruby-o-meter here just a tad.
At the moment I'm inclined to say that the *only* interpolators in
double quotes are:
\n, \t etc.
$foo
@foo[$i]
%foo{$k}
{EXPR}
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 19:15:49 +0200, Juerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Perl 6 Summarizer skribis 2004-07-20 14:46 (+0100):
Another subthread discussed interpolation in strings. Larry'schanged
his mind so that "$file.ext" is now interpreted as
"$object.method". You
need to do "${file
> "LW" == Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
LW> Actually, I've been rethinking this whole mess since last week, and
LW> am seriously considering cranking up the Ruby-o-meter here just a tad.
LW> At the moment I'm inclined to say that the *only* interpolators in
LW> double quotes
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 06:28:11PM -0400, Aaron Sherman wrote:
: > My preference is "$file\.ext". Clear, light and ascii.
:
: That's fine as far as it goes, but how do you say what, in Perl 5, I
: would use this for:
:
: "${foo}n"
:
: I like the ${} syntax, but I'm a shell guy from my earl
On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 13:15, Juerd wrote:
> The Perl 6 Summarizer skribis 2004-07-20 14:46 (+0100):
Wasn't there an actual thread to respond to for this? I always feel odd
turning the summary into a thread on what it's summarizing.
> My preference is "$file\.ext". Clear, light and ascii.
That's
The Perl 6 Summarizer skribis 2004-07-20 14:46 (+0100):
> Another subthread discussed interpolation in strings. Larry's changed
> his mind so that "$file.ext" is now interpreted as "$object.method". You
> need to do "${file}.ext" or ""$( $file ).ext"". Or maybe "$«file».ext"
> by an
--- The Perl 6 Summarizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, so the interview was on Tuesday 13th of July.
> It went well; I'm going to be a maths teacher.
"As usual, we begin with maths-geometry:
In Mathematics last week, one Pythagoras suggested there might be a
relationship between the sides
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 2004-07-18
Following last week's bizarrely dated summary (I misplaced a day) we're
back with the correct week ending date, but I'm ashamed to admit that
I've slipped to writing on a Tuesday again. My head hangs in shame and I
am filled with the
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004, Andrew Shitov wrote:
> DW> my $text is TextFile("/tmp/bar");
> DW> $text = "hello"; # writes, truncates
> DW> $text ~= ", world\n"; # appends
>
> DW> $text.print "again\n"; # for old-times sake
>
> Anyhow we still need $text.flush() or $text.close() methods.
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Jonadab the Unsightly One wrote:
> > If I extend the natural numbers N with Inf to a new set NI (N with
> > Inf)
>
> The problem is, NI is not a group with respect to addition for any
> definition of addition of which I am aware. Translated from mathese
In other words, or m
13 matches
Mail list logo
