Hans Ginzel writes:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 09:12:16PM +1000, Gautam Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> > about string subscripting. Since $a[0] cannot be mistaken for array subscripting
> > anymore, could this now be used to peep into scalars? Looks easier than using
>
>Are there plans in Perl 6 for s
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 09:12:16PM +1000, Gautam Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> about string subscripting. Since $a[0] cannot be mistaken for array subscripting
> anymore, could this now be used to peep into scalars? Looks easier than using
Are there plans in Perl 6 for string modifiers? As they are i
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 11:50:16PM -0400, JOSEPH RYAN wrote:
>
> To answer the latter first, rand (with no arguments) returns a number
> greater than or equal to 0 and less than 1 which when used as an index
> into an array gets turned into a 0.
>
> As to why the second pop would take forever, I
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 11:46:25AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
: With an array
: match, you might find yourself redispatching individual operators in a
: switch statement to provide that kind of specificity.
In particular, macros with "is parsed" will want to have a place to
hang their special parse
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 04:49:33AM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
: Michele Dondi writes:
: > On the wild side of things, could there be the possibility of even
: > defining new ones?
:
: That's what I meant by:
:
: grammatical_category:postcircumfix
:
: Though it wouldn't be so magical as to jus
--- Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 10:52:34AM -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
>
> : Or was that to imply that a literal "a" in the RE would be
> : interpretted as a "grapheme a" when :u2 is active?
>
> I don't know what you mean by "grapheme a" there. If you me
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Piers Cawley wrote:
> "Jonadab the Unsightly One" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The Perl 6 Summarizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> Different OO models
> >> Jonadab the Unsightly One had wondered about having objects
> >> inheriting behaviour from objects r
Gautam Gopalakrishnan writes:
> Hello,
>
> I've tried the archives and the 'Perl 6 essentials' book and I can't
> find anything
> about string subscripting. Since $a[0] cannot be mistaken for array subscripting
> anymore, could this now be used to peep into scalars? Looks easier than using
> subst
Gautam Gopalakrishnan skribis 2004-07-08 21:12 (+1000):
> about string subscripting. Since $a[0] cannot be mistaken for array subscripting
> anymore, could this now be used to peep into scalars? Looks easier than using
$a[0] is $a.[0]. That means that if there is a @$a, it still is array
subscript
Hello,
I've tried the archives and the 'Perl 6 essentials' book and I can't
find anything
about string subscripting. Since $a[0] cannot be mistaken for array subscripting
anymore, could this now be used to peep into scalars? Looks easier than using
substr or unpack. Hope I've not missed anything o
Michele Dondi writes:
> On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Luke Palmer wrote:
>
> > > Are there others, aside from these: ?
> > >
> > > prefix: a unary prefix operator
> > > infix: a binary infix operator
> > > postfix:a binary suffix operator
> > > circumfix: a bracketing operato
"Jonadab the Unsightly One" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The Perl 6 Summarizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Different OO models
>> Jonadab the Unsightly One had wondered about having objects
>> inheriting behaviour from objects rather than classes in Perl 6.
>
> Urgle. I've complet
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Luke Palmer wrote:
> > Are there others, aside from these: ?
> >
> > prefix: a unary prefix operator
> > infix: a binary infix operator
> > postfix:a binary suffix operator
> > circumfix: a bracketing operator
>
> Tons. From A12:
[snip]
On the
13 matches
Mail list logo
