On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 11:50:16PM -0400, JOSEPH RYAN wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wednesday, July 7, 2004 11:25 pm
> Subject: Re: push with lazy lists
>
> > On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 09:32:07PM -0500, Dan
> Hursh wrote:
> > : how 'bout
>
- Original Message -
From: Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, July 7, 2004 11:25 pm
Subject: Re: push with lazy lists
> On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 09:32:07PM -0500, Dan
Hursh wrote:
> : how 'bout
> :
> : @x = gather{
> : loop{
> : take time
> : }
> : } # can
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 03:03:49PM -0400, JOSEPH RYAN wrote:
: Sure. The parser won't care what kind of characters
: make up the operator, as long as its defined by the
: time the operator is encountered. The "operator"
: rules in the grammar will probably be as simple as this:
:
: # where x is
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 09:32:07PM -0500, Dan Hursh wrote:
: how 'bout
:
: @x = gather{
: loop{
: take time
: }
: } # can this be @x = gather { take time loop }
: push @x, "later";
: say pop @x;# "later"
Can probably be made to work right.
: say pop @x;# heat death?
Ye
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 08:09:51PM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
: On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 10:52:34AM -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
: : On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 08:34:16AM -0700, Austin Hastings wrote:
: : > This has no direct bearing on p6l, since performance is a p6i issue.
: : > But perhaps in the
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 10:52:34AM -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
: On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 08:34:16AM -0700, Austin Hastings wrote:
: > This has no direct bearing on p6l, since performance is a p6i issue.
: > But perhaps in the interests of performance as well as hackery we
: > should explicitl
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 07:41:22PM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
: Considering that:
:
: $obj.meth "foo";
:
: No longer needs parentheses, and that argument processing is done on the
: callee rather than the caller side (well, most of the time), do I still
: have to predeclare C if I want to say:
The Perl 6 Summarizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Different OO models
> Jonadab the Unsightly One had wondered about having objects
> inheriting behaviour from objects rather than classes in Perl 6.
Urgle. I've completely failed to explain myself so as to be
understood. That wasn't
--- Austin Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> . . . .
> Of the qualities you listed for Pumpking:
>
> "Look, I already told you! I deal with the goddamn customers so the
> engineers don't have to! I have people skills! I am good at dealing
> with people! Can't you understand that? What the hell
David Storrs writes:
> On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 06:39:07PM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
> > Matija Papec writes:
> > >
> > > Would there be a way to still use simple unquoted hash keys like in old
> > > days ($hash{MYKEY})?
> >
> > Of course there's a way to do it. This is one of those decisions th
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 06:39:07PM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
> Matija Papec writes:
> >
> > Would there be a way to still use simple unquoted hash keys like in old
> > days ($hash{MYKEY})?
>
> Of course there's a way to do it. This is one of those decisions that I
> was against for the longest
11 matches
Mail list logo
