Re: FW: Periodic Table of the Operators

2004-06-07 Thread David Cantrell
Mark J. Reed wrote: On 2004-06-07 at 21:33:03, David Cantrell wrote: This is what is so wrong about allowing unicode operators - yes, I don't need to write them, but if some other programmer writes one I have to be able to read it. And I can't. Well, for one thing, just because your email program

Re: FW: Periodic Table of the Operators

2004-06-07 Thread Mark J. Reed
On 2004-06-07 at 21:33:03, David Cantrell wrote: > This is what is so wrong about allowing unicode operators - yes, I don't > need to write them, but if some other programmer writes one I have to be > able to read it. And I can't. Well, for one thing, just because your email program doesn't let

Re: FW: Periodic Table of the Operators

2004-06-07 Thread David Cantrell
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 04:21:14PM -0400, Mark J. Reed wrote: > Since you've added ? and ? to the list above, I'll add them as well: What's so hard to type about the question mark? And what's so significant that you added it twice? OK, so I know that you really meant to type and . This is wha

This fortnight's summary

2004-06-07 Thread The Perl 6 Summarizer
The Perl 6 Summary for the fortnight ending 2004-06-06 Whee! There's a new graphics card in the G5, which means I can type this at the big screen again, which makes me happy. Well, it would make me far happier if the new card didn't leave horrible artifacts all over the screen like