Larry Wall wrote:
> Well, it's too bad the emacs developers are lagging behind the vim
> developers in this area, but it might (or might not) have something to
> do with the fact that certain obnoxious people like me were bugging
> the vim folks incessantly to get their Unicode story straight for
--- Smylers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luke Palmer writes:
>
> > for @(@ranges[1]) -> $i {
>
> Oooh, where did that dereferencing syntax come from, using parens rather
> than braces?
@(...) is the "list context" operator in S3. I hope array references won't
explode in list context, that wo
Smylers wrote:
Luke Palmer writes:
for @(@ranges[1]) -> $i {
Oooh, where did that dereferencing syntax come from, using parens rather
than braces?
It isn't a dereferencing syntax--it's a context-forcing syntax (one I'm
intimately familiar with), which forces @ranges[1] into list context.
Wh
Luke Palmer writes:
> for @(@ranges[1]) -> $i {
Oooh, where did that dereferencing syntax come from, using parens rather
than braces?
Smylers
On Mar 22, 2004, at 10:36 PM, David Wheeler wrote:
I'll wait and see what I hear back from the Emacs developers. In the
meantime, there's TextEdit.
I've heard back that it may be that Unicode support simply isn't
included in the Carbonized version of Mac OS X. They plan to look into
it.
Regard
