Re: Magic blocks (was: Compile-time undefined sub detection)

2004-03-06 Thread Larry Wall
Oh, I accidentally left NEXT out of my canonical list. We do need to have the equivalent to Perl 5's "continue". Larry

Magic blocks (was: Compile-time undefined sub detection)

2004-03-06 Thread Larry Wall
Okay you guys, you're running away from one kind of madness and proposing various other kinds of madness in its place. Mostly you're confusing what should be easy and what should be possible. First a note about cleanup dependencies. In general, these should be driven by the structure of the data

RE: Compile-time undefined sub detection

2004-03-06 Thread Austin Hastings
> -Original Message- > From: Luke Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Austin Hastings writes: > > # Each "broad class" of upcased block is an execution group. The entries > > # in each execution group are not guaranteed to run in any > particular order, > > # and in fact may run in paral

Re: Compile-time undefined sub detection

2004-03-06 Thread Luke Palmer
Austin Hastings writes: > Perhaps this is one of those places where properties can help. Instead of > having BEFORE, REALLY_BEFORE, NO_I_MEAN_REALLY_BEFORE, DONE, MOSTLY_DONE, > PARTIALLY_DONE, WELL_DONE, DONE_AND_PROCESS_SPACE_ALMOST_RECLAIMED, etc., we > could simply use some ordering properties: