--- Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, that's true. But note that you can't do that black magic you
> were
> speaking of earlier:
>
> $a [ (cond ?? &infix:+ : &infix:*) but tighter(&infix:*) ] $b
>
> Because we can't choose the precedence of an operator after we parse
> it... un
The Perl 6 Summary of the week ending 20030928
This week, on perl6-internals, stuff was said, code was written, Leo
Tötsch was the patchmonster, life got some colour, Amir Karger needs to
work harder if he wants to be mentioned in the summary again, Dan
Sugalski was our glorious lea
