Luke Palmer wrote:
>
> Wow, what an old thread...
>
> Jonadab the Unsightly One writes:
> > "Abhijit A. Mahabal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On the other hand, if you wanted to say "true for all except exactly
> > > one value, I can't think of a way.
> >
> > Easy. The following two sta
Wow, what an old thread...
Jonadab the Unsightly One writes:
> "Abhijit A. Mahabal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On the other hand, if you wanted to say "true for all except exactly
> > one value, I can't think of a way.
>
> Easy. The following two statements are
"Abhijit A. Mahabal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On the other hand, if you wanted to say "true for all except exactly
> one value, I can't think of a way.
Easy. The following two statements are equivalent:
F(x) is true for all but exactly one x
(not F(x)) is true for exactly one x
The onl
