Rafael Garcia-Suarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jonathan Scott Duff wrote in perl.perl6.language :
>>
>> My only dream is that by this time next year we have a fully-
>> functional-people-can-use-it-in-production Perl6. It doesn't even
>> have to be 100% complete; I think just 85% would be en
Jonathan Scott Duff wrote in perl.perl6.language :
>
> My only dream is that by this time next year we have a fully-
> functional-people-can-use-it-in-production Perl6. It doesn't even
> have to be 100% complete; I think just 85% would be enough if it were
> the right 85%.
20% would be enough if
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 10:50:40PM -0400, Miko O Sullivan wrote:
> It would be interesting to hear your Perl6 daydreams.
My only dream is that by this time next year we have a fully-
functional-people-can-use-it-in-production Perl6. It doesn't even
have to be 100% complete; I think just 85% would
Ah, summertime (at least here in the northern hemisphere). The language list
has slowed down to a trickle, hopefully because everybody is relaxing in a
cool place, idly sipping non-alcoholic spritzers next to some special person,
reading low-brow literature (or, as in my case, Apoc 6).
This is
