On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 10:10:09PM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 12:38:59 -0800
> > From: David Storrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Some random musings, for what they're worth...
> >
> > 1) The fact that we've had this long thread about arrays and shows
> >that they are
I just wrote:
> ... I'm strongly in us limiting new features to those that come about
Um, try "I'm strongly in favour of limiting" etc.
> through a desire for particular functionality rather than a desire to
> use up some 'spare' syntax ...
Sorry about that.
Smylers
Luke Palmer wrote:
> The real question is, if they don't auto-vector, what I this do:
>
> @a = (4, 1, 2) + 7;
>
> @a could be (9) or (10), maybe even (\(4,1,2)+7), but hopefully not.
What about making that a fatal error? If it doesn't do anything
sensible -- and if all the suggested outcom
