At 1:10 PM + 1/6/03, Piers Cawley wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
An object is a data type, as much as an array or hash is a data type,
but that doesn't make an array an object. [insert obligatory "all men
are Socratese" quote here)
I really hope you're wrong here Dan. At
On Friday, January 3, 2003, at 01:19 PM, Dave Whipp wrote:
Conversly, an C operation should be nothing more than
$obj = new ArrayLikeThing;
@a := $obj; # the tie
I was under the impression that a more concise way of saying that would
be:
my @a = new ArrayLikeThing;
-or-
my @a is
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Luke Palmer wrote:
> From: Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> is a fatal error. I could argue for this to change, as to support
> better readability (and it would). It's obvious WIM, so why doesn't it
> DWIM (disclaimer: cannot be used as an argument for arbitrary features.
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> An object is a data type, as much as an array or hash is a data type,
> but that doesn't make an array an object. [insert obligatory "all men
> are Socratese" quote here)
I really hope you're wrong here Dan. At least in that particular
case. Being able to
