Re: perl6 operator precedence table

2002-10-20 Thread Smylers
Me wrote: > > Somebody fairly recently recommended some decent fixed-width > > typefaces. I think it may have been MJD ... > > Michael Schwern recently suggested "Monaco, Neep or, if you can find > them, Mishawaka or ProFont". Ah, yes. That's what I was failing to recollect. (Apologies to bot

Re: perl6 operator precedence table

2002-10-20 Thread Me
> Somebody fairly recently recommended some decent fixed-width typefaces. > I think it may have been MJD, but I can't find the reference right now > (could be at work). Michael Schwern recently suggested "Monaco, Neep or, if you can find them, Mishawaka or ProFont". I investigated and found this

Re: perl6 operator precedence table

2002-10-20 Thread Smylers
Larry Wall wrote: > $a .! $b # bitwise xor > $a ! $b # logical xor > ! $b # logical not > > I like the notion that binary ! means that the two sides are sharing > one "not". That's the definition of XOR in a nutshell. I like that too. It also means that C and C<.!!> become

Re: perl6 operator precedence table

2002-10-20 Thread Smylers
Mark J. Reed wrote: > On 2002-10-17 at 22:52:49, Smylers wrote: > > > ... I initially misread the bar as an exclamation mark. I realize > > that this is a sample size of one ... > > Make that a sample size of two. Well, not really. (Presumably there are many other people who also read Larry's m